Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Coronary sinus shocking lead as salvage in patients with advanced CHF and high defibrillation thresholds
Osman Faheem1, Arun Padala, Jeffrey Kluger
1Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Insights
For patients with advanced cardiomyopathy, a novel approach using the coronary sinus for left ventricular shocking electrode placement successfully achieved defibrillation thresholds (DFT) when standard implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) methods failed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation can fail to achieve adequate defibrillation thresholds (DFT) in patients with advanced cardiomyopathy.
- Standard modification and enhancement procedures were ineffective in three reported patients.
Observation:
- Coronary sinus (CS) placement of a left ventricular (LV) shocking electrode was utilized.
- Posterior coil positioning in the CS was employed in all three patients.
- In two patients, the LV shocking coil was placed alongside a CS pacing lead.
Findings:
- Acceptable DFTs were achieved in all three patients using the CS approach.
- The optimal shocking configuration identified was LV (CS) (Anode) to RV (cathode).
- Short- and long-term outcomes for these patients were presented and discussed.
Implications:
- This CS lead placement strategy serves as a viable salvage option for challenging ICD implantations.
- It addresses cases where standard methods fail to achieve adequate DFTs.
- This technique may improve ICD implantation success rates in patients with complex cardiac conditions.
Background:
We report a series of three patients whose implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) implants were unsuccessful due to inability to achieve defibrillation thresholds (DFT) at maximum available energy after failure of standard modification and enhancement procedures. All patients had advanced cardiomyopathy.
Methods:
Use of the coronary sinus (CS) for left ventricular (LV) shocking electrode placement resulted in acceptable DFTs in each patient. The position of the shocking coil in all three patients was posterior, and in two patients alongside a left ventricular CS pacing lead. The best shocking configuration tested was LV (CS) + CAN (Anode) to RV (cathode) in each patient. The short- and long-term outcomes of these patients is presented and discussed.
Conclusion:
This approach is suggested as a salvage option for those problematic patients who have unacceptable DFT results at implantation of an endovascular ICD system.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

