Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison01:27

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of Criticality and Frequency of Tasks by the Public Health Workforce, 2022.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2024
Same author

Factors Impacting Patients' Willingness to Recommend: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Journal of patient experience·2022
Same author

Patient Satisfaction, Quality Attributes, and Organizational Characteristics: A Hierarchical Linear Model Approach.

Journal of patient experience·2020
Same author

What Factors Affect Patient Perceptions on Their Hospital Experience?

Hospital topics·2020
Same author

Different Combining Process Between Male and Female Patients to Reach Their Overall Satisfaction.

Journal of patient experience·2017
Same author

Advancing the Certified in Public Health Examination: A Job Task Analysis.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2017
Same journal

Exploring the underlying mechanisms through which financial strategies translate into improved performance in U.S health care organizations.

Health care management review·2026
Same journal

Profession-led vs collaborative workforce models in dental, vision, and hearing care for older adults in community care: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Health care management review·2026
Same journal

Bridging health and social care: Governance insights from Thailand's S-TOP intermediate care pilot.

Health care management review·2026
Same journal

Long-term care policies in the Asia-Pacific Aged Care Hub (APACH) countries: A scoping review.

Health care management review·2026
Same journal

Expatriate health care workers in Saudi Arabia: Exploring workforce integration, advantages, and challenges in a globalized health care system.

Health care management review·2026
Same journal

Acceptance of digital health technologies in health and aged care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Health care management review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Patient satisfaction integration process: are there any racial differences?

Koichiro Otani1, Patrick A Herrmann, Richard S Kurz

  • 1Division of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Fort Wayne, USA. otanik@ipfw.edu

Health Care Management Review
|March 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient satisfaction differs between racial groups. Caucasian patients are risk-averse, while African American patients average attribute reactions, requiring tailored interventions for improved healthcare experiences.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare research
  • Health services research
  • Patient experience

Background:

  • Patient satisfaction is crucial in healthcare management and research.
  • Existing studies often overlook racial differences in how patients combine attribute reactions.
  • Minority populations may be statistically marginalized in analyses assuming uniform attribute importance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differential attribute combining processes between Caucasian and African American patients.
  • To understand how racial groups uniquely form overall satisfaction judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 32 hospitals via the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospital Survey.
  • Analyzed 29,684 patient cases using multiple linear regression with a scatter term.
  • Controlled for demographic and health-related variables like age, gender, perceived health, and education.

Main Results:

  • Both Caucasian and African American patients recognize the same four key attributes: nursing, staff, physician care, and environment.
  • Significant differences were observed in the weighting (parameter estimates) of these attributes between the two racial groups.
  • Caucasian patients exhibited risk-averse behavior, whereas African American patients tended to average attribute reactions proportionally.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare interventions to improve patient satisfaction must be tailored, as a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective.
  • Recognizing distinct satisfaction-forming processes in Caucasian and African American patients is essential for targeted improvement strategies.
  • Differentiated interventions are necessary to enhance the overall hospital stay evaluations for diverse patient populations.