Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Protein-based Inheritance in S. cerevisiae
Published on: August 8, 2017
Coinfecting prion strains compete for a limiting cellular resource
Ronald A Shikiya1, Jacob I Ayers, Charles R Schutt
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Abstract:
Prion strain interference can influence the emergence of a dominant strain from a mixture; however, the mechanisms underlying prion strain interference are poorly understood. In our model of strain interference, inoculation of the sciatic nerve with the drowsy (DY) strain of the transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) agent prior to superinfection with the hyper (HY) strain of TME can completely block HY TME from causing disease. We show here that the deposition of PrP(Sc), in the absence of neuronal loss or spongiform change, in the central nervous system corresponds with the ability of DY TME to block HY TME infection. This suggests that DY TME agent-induced damage is not responsible for strain interference but rather prions compete for a cellular resource. We show that protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) of DY and HY TME maintains the strain-specific properties of PrP(Sc) and replicates infectious agent and that DY TME can interfere, or completely block, the emergence of HY TME. DY PrP(Sc) does not convert all of the available PrP(C) to PrP(Sc) in PMCA, suggesting the mechanism of prion strain interference is due to the sequestering of PrP(C) and/or other cellular components required for prion conversion. The emergence of HY TME in PMCA was controlled by the initial ratio of the TME agents. A higher ratio of DY to HY TME agent is required for complete blockage of HY TME in PMCA compared to several previous in vivo studies, suggesting that HY TME persists in animals coinfected with the two strains. This was confirmed by PMCA detection of HY PrP(Sc) in animals where DY TME had completely blocked HY TME from causing disease.
Insights
Prion strain interference, where one prion strain blocks another, occurs because prions compete for cellular resources, not due to damage. Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) models this competition, showing strain interference is influenced by agent ratios.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Prion strain interference influences disease progression but its mechanisms remain unclear.
- Transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) strains, drowsy (DY) and hyper (HY), provide a model to study this interference.
- Previous studies suggest interference is linked to agent interactions within the host.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the mechanisms of prion strain interference.
- To investigate the role of PrP(Sc) deposition and cellular resource competition in blocking HY TME infection by DY TME.
- To validate findings using protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA).
Main Methods:
- Inoculation of sciatic nerve with DY TME followed by HY TME in a mouse model.
- Analysis of PrP(Sc) deposition in the central nervous system.
- Application of PMCA to model prion strain interference in vitro.
- Quantification of DY:HY TME ratios in PMCA and infected animals.
Main Results:
- DY TME inoculation blocked HY TME disease without causing neuronal damage, indicating competition for cellular resources.
- PMCA successfully replicated infectious agent and maintained strain-specific PrP(Sc) properties.
- DY TME interfered with HY TME emergence in PMCA, with blockage dependent on the DY:HY ratio.
- HY PrP(Sc) was detected in animals where DY TME blocked HY TME disease, suggesting HY TME persistence.
Conclusions:
- Prion strain interference is mediated by competition for cellular resources, such as PrP(C), rather than agent-induced damage.
- PMCA is a viable method for studying prion strain interference and the dynamics of prion conversion.
- The ratio of competing prion strains is critical for determining the outcome of interference, with potential for subclinical persistence of the blocked strain.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Interactions: Competition
Competition
Viral Recombination
Stringent Response in E. coli
Subviral Agents
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...

