Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrophysiologic testing.

C Fisch1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indianapolis.

Advances in Internal Medicine
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bundle branch block of the broad S type; report of eleven cases without any evidence of heart disease with one instance showing partial and transient block.

The Journal of the Indiana State Medical Association·2010
Same author

[Intrasphenoidal meningocele and osteopetrosis: a case report].

Journal de radiologie·2008
Same author

C-reactive protein mediates CD11b expression in monocytes through the non-receptor tyrosine kinase, Syk, and calcium mobilization but not through cytosolic peroxides.

Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]·2006
Same author

Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2002
Same author

ECG of the month. A-V block.

Cardiology in review·2001
Same author

ECG of the month: Wolff-Parkinson-White arrhythmias.

Cardiology in review·2001
Same journal

Nutrition and nutritional diseases in the Orient.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
Same journal

Nutritional requirements in disease.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
Same journal

Problem of the rhesus antigen in medicine.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
Same journal

Penicillin treatment of subacute bacterial endocarditis.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
Same journal

Physiologic and medical aspects of aviation and deep sea diving.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
Same journal

Progress in the development of insecticides for prevention of insect-borne diseases.

Advances in internal medicine·2010
See all related articles

Classifying clinical states for electrophysiological studies (EPS) is challenging due to overlapping indications. EPS utility varies, with some states frequently benefiting, others showing divided opinions, and some rarely proving helpful or even causing harm.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Medical Procedures

Background:

  • Grouping clinical states for electrophysiological study (EPS) indications and contraindications presents challenges.
  • Significant overlap exists between conditions where EPS is indicated and contraindicated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To classify clinical states based on the utility and indications for electrophysiological studies (EPS).
  • To delineate three general groups regarding the benefit and contraindications of EPS.

Main Methods:

  • Review and categorization of clinical states based on the established utility of EPS.
  • Summarization of clinical states and EPS utility in a tabular format (Table 1).

Main Results:

  • Electrophysiological studies (EPS) indications are difficult to group due to considerable overlap.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three general groups of EPS utility were identified: frequently indicated, occasionally beneficial with divided opinions, and rarely helpful or harmful.
  • Specific clinical states and their associated EPS utility are detailed.
  • Conclusions:

    • A clear classification of clinical states for EPS indication and contraindication is complex.
    • The utility of EPS varies significantly across different clinical conditions, ranging from highly beneficial to potentially harmful.