Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Postarteriographic pressure dressings: two types.

R D Blankenship, L A Clegg, D T Powell

    Critical Care Nurse
    |May 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compared standard pressure dressings to pelvic-girdle-type dressings after arteriography. Results indicate the pelvic-girdle-type dressing may reduce complications like hematomas and bleeding.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Worker perceptions and actions toward cancer control in the workplace: an analysis of baseline data.

    Progress in clinical and biological research·1987
    Same author

    Designed for food.

    Royal Society of Health journal·1966
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Vascular Surgery
    • Critical Care Nursing
    • Medical Device Innovation

    Background:

    • Post-arteriographic wound complications are a concern.
    • Standard pressure dressings are commonly used.
    • Alternative dressings may offer improved outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare tape injuries, hematomas, and recurrent bleeding.
    • To evaluate the efficacy of pelvic-girdle-type pressure dressings.
    • To inform critical care nursing practices.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing arteriography.
    • Comparison between standard pressure dressing and pelvic-girdle-type pressure dressing groups.
    • Assessment of wound complication rates.

    Main Results:

    • The pelvic-girdle-type pressure dressing group showed a trend towards fewer hematomas.
    • No significant difference was observed in tape injuries or recurrent bleeding.
    • Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Pelvic-girdle-type pressure dressings may offer potential benefits in reducing post-arteriographic hematomas.
    • Current evidence does not strongly support a reduction in tape injuries or recurrent bleeding.
    • Clinical practice may benefit from considering alternative dressing types.

    Related Experiment Videos