Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics in research.

H S Siegel1

  • 1Department of Poultry Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.

Poultry Science
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research misconduct includes data falsification, lack of credit, plagiarism, conflicts of interest, and biased research. Conflicts of interest and biased research are particularly damaging to public trust in science.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Total cholesterol, total triglycerides, and cholesterol distribution among lipoproteins as predictors of atherosclerosis in selected lines of Japanese quail.

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology·2001
Same author

Epitopes for chicken monoclonal antibodies in spleens of selected Japanese quail lines.

Developmental and comparative immunology·1999
Same author

Effect of genetic selection and MHC haplotypes on lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-2 like activity in chicken lines selected for high and low antibody production against sheep red blood cells.

Veterinary immunology and immunopathology·1999
Same author

Impact of cage density on pullet performance and blood parameters of stress.

Poultry science·1998
Same author

Dietary cholesterol metabolism in Japanese quail lines selected for plasma cholesterol levels.

Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)·1997
Same author

Changes in blood and spleen lymphocyte populations following antigen challenge in immature male chickens.

British poultry science·1996
Same journal

Assessment of freshness and oxidative stability of chicken meat patties at refrigerated storage using Dillenia indica peel powder: A natural substitute for synthetic antioxidants.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Blood acid/base balance in poultry: Dietary, environmental, and physiological determinants and emerging diagnostic opportunities.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Avian herpesvirus-specific LORF5 is a late gene,interacts with 19 viral and 111 host proteins, critical for virulence of Duck plague virus" [Poultry Science, Volume 105, Issue 7, July 2026, 106924].

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Assessing the impact of dietary interventions on the resistomes of broiler chickens.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Pasture-based versus conventional broiler chicken production: Enterprise budget modeling and profitability analysis.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Characterizing locomotor behavior variability in commercial broiler flocks using large-scale video tracking.

Poultry science·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Unethical research conduct undermines scientific validity and public trust.
  • Understanding categories of misconduct is crucial for maintaining scientific standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To categorize and define common forms of unethical research conduct.
  • To highlight the insidious nature and impact of specific research misconduct types.

Main Methods:

  • Categorization of unethical research practices.
  • Qualitative analysis of misconduct types and their consequences.

Main Results:

  • Five categories of research misconduct identified: data falsification, failure to credit, plagiarism, conflicts of commitment/interest, and biased research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conflicts of interest and biased research are identified as particularly serious due to their difficulty in detection and erosion of public confidence.

    • Conclusions:

    • All forms of research misconduct are unacceptable.
    • Conflicts of interest and biased research pose significant threats to the integrity of science and public trust.