Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics and the scientist.

J E Marion1

  • 1College of Agriculture, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.

Poultry Science
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific ethics are increasingly scrutinized, with scientists facing unique obligations and documented indiscretions. This analysis explores ethical expectations in areas like consulting and advocacy, and actions being taken to address these concerns.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nondestructive Quality Evaluation of Agricultural Products - Industrial Application.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Flavopiridol inhibits P-TEFb and blocks HIV-1 replication.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2000
Same author

Influence of source and physical form of xanthophyll pigment on broiler pigmentation and performance.

Poultry science·1988
Same author

Influence of Monoprop in controlling mold growth and improving chick performance when fed high moisture corn.

Poultry science·1987
Same author

Nutritive value of new cultivars of triticale and wheat for broiler chick diets.

Poultry science·1987
Same author

Oxidation of chicken tissue lipids as influenced by age and sex.

Poultry science·1969
Same journal

Assessment of freshness and oxidative stability of chicken meat patties at refrigerated storage using Dillenia indica peel powder: A natural substitute for synthetic antioxidants.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Blood acid/base balance in poultry: Dietary, environmental, and physiological determinants and emerging diagnostic opportunities.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Avian herpesvirus-specific LORF5 is a late gene,interacts with 19 viral and 111 host proteins, critical for virulence of Duck plague virus" [Poultry Science, Volume 105, Issue 7, July 2026, 106924].

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Assessing the impact of dietary interventions on the resistomes of broiler chickens.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Pasture-based versus conventional broiler chicken production: Enterprise budget modeling and profitability analysis.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Characterizing locomotor behavior variability in commercial broiler flocks using large-scale video tracking.

Poultry science·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • * Scientific Ethics and Societal Accountability

Background:

  • * Growing public and professional attention to ethical issues in science.
  • * Evolving societal perceptions of scientists' status and responsibilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To examine the unique ethical obligations of scientists.
  • * To discuss ethical expectations in professional contexts like consulting and advocacy.
  • * To explore the role of scientists as administrators and current actions in scientific ethics.

Main Methods:

  • * Literature review and analysis of documented ethical indiscretions.
  • * Discussion of ethical considerations in specific scientific roles.
  • * Summary of initiatives addressing scientific ethics.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • * Scientists face increasing scrutiny and have distinct professional obligations.
  • * Ethical challenges arise in areas such as consulting, animal rights, and advocacy.
  • * The role of scientists in administration presents unique ethical considerations.

Conclusions:

  • * The scientific community must proactively address ethical challenges.
  • * Clear guidelines and actions are necessary to uphold scientific integrity.
  • * Ongoing dialogue is crucial for navigating the evolving ethical landscape in science.