Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence intervals for post-test probability.

M J Monsour1, A T Evans, L L Kupper

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients with low-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma do not require extended out-patient follow-up.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2017
Same author

Retrospective analysis of detomidine infusion for standing chemical restraint in 51 horses.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2017
Same author

The effect of four anesthetic protocols on the spleen in dogs.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2017
Same author

Echocardiographic evaluation of dogs receiving 1:1 thiopental/propofol in a clinical setting.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2017
Same author

Evaluation of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous lidocaine and bupivacaine for analgesia following ovariohysterectomy in the dog.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2017
Same author

Genetic Library.

Journal of genetic counseling·2015
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study presents methods for calculating confidence intervals for diagnostic test accuracy, addressing scenarios with and without local data. It provides a way to estimate the uncertainty of post-test probability when site-specific prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity are unknown.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Diagnostic Test Evaluation
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Confidence intervals are crucial for quantifying uncertainty in diagnostic test results.
  • Post-test probability estimation is vital for clinical decision-making.
  • Limited availability of local data (prevalence, sensitivity, specificity) poses challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate methods for calculating confidence intervals for post-test probability in diagnostic testing.
  • To address scenarios where local epidemiological and test performance data are unavailable.
  • To compare different approaches for confidence interval estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Calculating confidence intervals for post-test probability using local data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developing a novel method for confidence interval calculation using external data when local data is absent.
  • Utilizing simulation studies for validation and comparison.
  • Illustrating methods with the diagnosis of strep throat.

    • Main Results:

    • Confidence intervals calculated with local data align with existing literature.
    • The developed method provides a viable approach for estimating confidence intervals when local data is missing.
    • Simulation results support the validity of both methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The study offers practical solutions for assessing diagnostic test uncertainty.
    • Methods are applicable in diverse clinical settings, including those with limited data.
    • Accurate confidence intervals enhance the reliability of diagnostic test interpretation.