Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs.

M S Cooke1, S H Wei

  • 1Department of Children's Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of Hong Kong.

Australian Dental Journal
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Retaking cephalometric radiographs introduces greater errors than re-measuring them. This study found error percentages doubled when radiographs were retaken, highlighting potential inaccuracies in repeated cephalometric analyses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Application value of ocular multimodal imaging methods in the evaluation of increased intracranial pressure].

[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

[Prevalence trend and risk factors for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection in Qinghai Province based on <sup>13</sup>C urea breath test results].

Zhonghua nei ke za zhi·2026
Same author

[Meta-analysis of influencing factors on the progression of pneumoconiosis].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2026
Same author

[Paying attention to neuropathic changes in high myopia].

[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology·2024
Same author

[A case of surgical resection for gallbladder carcinoma with multiple liver metastases after downgrading transformation with the combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy].

Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]·2023
Same author

[Optic atrophy in a patient with axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 2A2A due to MFN2 gene mutations].

[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology·2023

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Radiology
  • Craniofacial Imaging

Background:

  • Cephalometric radiography is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Assessing landmark location errors is vital for accurate skeletal and dental measurements.
  • Existing methods for quantifying measurement error may not fully reflect clinical significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare landmark location errors between re-measuring existing cephalometric radiographs and retaking new ones.
  • To introduce and evaluate the 'error percentage' as a clinically meaningful index of measurement error.
  • To identify specific cephalometric landmarks and measures prone to increased error upon radiograph retake.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 32 remeasured and 22 retaken cephalometric radiographs from 12-year-old Chinese children in Hong Kong.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Radiographs taken in natural head posture with lips in light contact.
  • Calculation of 'error percentage' (me2/SD2 * 100) for dento-skeletal and soft tissue profile measures.

    • Main Results:

    • The 'error percentage' was, on average, doubled for measurements on retaken radiographs compared to remeasured ones.
    • Measures with landmarks predominantly on the mid-sagittal plane exhibited the smallest increase in percentage error.
    • Poor reproducibility was observed for the Frankfort plane, functional occlusal plane, and incisor long axes.
    • Lips were identified as poor angular landmarks, and acute angles with short 'arms' showed large errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Errors associated with retaking cephalometric radiographs can be significantly greater than typically reported.
    • The 'error percentage' offers a more clinically relevant assessment of measurement variability than the standard 'method error'.
    • Careful landmark selection and consideration of potential errors are necessary, especially when repeating radiographic procedures.