Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Outcome and quality of life after aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery
Fernando J Abelha1, Miguela Botelho, Vera Fernandes
1Department of Anesthesia, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal. abelha@mail.telepac.pt
Insights
Aorto-bifemoral bypass (AFB) surgery improves perceived quality of life, but survivors experience increased dependency and poorer health scores. Congestive heart disease and APACHE II are key mortality predictors after AFB.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery Outcomes
- Patient-Reported Health Status
- Quality of Life Assessment
Background:
- Aorto-bifemoral bypass (AFB) is a standard treatment for aorto-iliac disease with durable outcomes.
- Existing research primarily focuses on mortality, morbidity, cost, and length of stay after AFB.
- Limited data exists on post-AFB patient dependency and changes in perceived health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate outcomes following aorto-bifemoral bypass (AFB) surgery.
- To identify determinants of patient outcomes after AFB.
- To assess changes in health-related quality of life and dependency post-AFB.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 75 patients undergoing infrarenal AFB in a multidisciplinary Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
- Comparison of preoperative characteristics and outcomes between occlusive and aneurysmal disease groups.
- Postoperative assessment using Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) evaluation at six months.
Main Results:
- The six-month mortality rate was 12%, with congestive heart disease and APACHE II identified as independent predictors.
- Patients with occlusive disease reported worse SF-36 scores in role-physical and general health perception.
- Survivors showed increased dependency in instrumental and personal ADL but reported improved general health (64%).
Conclusions:
- Congestive heart disease and APACHE II score are significant risk factors for mortality post-AFB.
- AFB survivors report improved quality of life despite increased dependency and lower SF-36 scores compared to the general population.
- The study highlights the need to consider patient-reported outcomes and dependency in the overall assessment of AFB success.
Background:
Aorto-bifemoral bypass (AFB) is commonly performed to treat aorto-iliac disease and a durable long-term outcome is achieved. Most studies documenting beneficial outcomes after AFB have been limited to mortality and morbidity rates, costs and length of hospital stay (LOS). Few studies have examined the dependency of patients and how their perception of their own health changes after surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcome after AFB and to study its determinants.
Methods:
This retrospective study was carried out in the multidisciplinary Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) with five intensive care beds. Out of 1597 intensive care patients admitted to the PACU, 75 were submitted to infrarenal AFB and admitted to these intensive care unit (ICU) beds over 2 years. Preoperative characteristics and outcome were evaluated by comparing occlusive disease with aneurysmatic disease patients. Six months after discharge, the patients were contacted to complete a Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36) and to have their dependency in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) evaluated. Patient's characteristics and postoperative follow-up data were compared using Mann-Whitney U test, t test for independent groups, chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Patient preoperative characteristics were evaluated for associations with mortality using a multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results:
The mortality rate was 12% at six months. Multivariate analysis identified congestive heart disease and APACHE II as independent determinants for mortality. Patients submitted to AFB for occlusive disease had worse SF-36 scores in role physical and general health perception. Patients submitted to AFB had worse SF-36 scores for all domains than a comparable urban population and had similar scores to other PACU patients. Sixty-six percent and 23% of patients were dependent in at least one activity in instrumental and personal ADL, respectively, but 64% reported having better general health.
Conclusion:
This study shows that congestive heart disease and APACHE II were risk factors for mortality after AFB surgery. Survivors who have undergone AFB perceive an improved quality of life although they are more dependent in ADL tasks and have worse scores in almost all SF-36 than the population to which they belong.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management