Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Screening for cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic patients
Jeffrey S Berger1, Courtney O Jordan2, Donald Lloyd-Jones3
1Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment is vital for prevention. Routine risk factor testing and score evaluation help healthcare providers discuss future risks with patients, enabling targeted interventions to reduce CVD.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of death, with significant lifetime risk for individuals.
- Assessing cardiovascular risk aids in targeting preventive treatments for asymptomatic individuals at high risk.
- Risk stratification for CVD presents challenges, especially for those with low or intermediate short-term risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare six major cardiovascular risk algorithms.
- To highlight uncertainties and limitations in current CVD risk assessment tools.
- To advocate for routine cardiovascular risk factor testing and score assessment in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of six risk algorithms: Framingham Risk Score, Adult Treatment Panel III, SCORE, Reynolds Risk Score, ASSIGN, and QRISK.
- Analysis of algorithms based on outcomes, population validation, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, included variables, and limitations.
- Discussion of areas of uncertainty including timeframes, endpoints, non-laboratory scores, and guiding therapy.
Main Results:
- Six distinct cardiovascular risk algorithms were described and compared.
- Key differences in outcomes predicted, validation populations, and variables used were identified.
- Significant uncertainties remain regarding the optimal application and interpretation of these risk scores.
Conclusions:
- Routine testing for cardiovascular risk factors and comprehensive risk score assessment are recommended for effective CVD evaluation and prevention.
- Healthcare providers should discuss global and lifetime cardiovascular risk with patients to enhance understanding and adherence to preventive strategies.
- Risk-guided interventions hold substantial potential for reducing population-level CVD risk.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease is the number 1 cause of death in the western world and 1 of the leading causes of death worldwide. The lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) for persons at age 50 years, on average, is estimated to be 52% for men and 39% for women, with a wide variation depending on risk factor burden. Assessing patients' cardiovascular risk may be used for the targeting of preventive treatments of individual patients who are asymptomatic but at sufficiently high risk for the development of CVD. Risk stratifying patients for CVD remains challenging, particularly for those with low or intermediate short-term risk. Several algorithms have been described to facilitate the assessment of risk in individual patients. We describe 6 risk algorithms (Framingham Risk Score for coronary heart disease events and for cardiovascular events, Adult Treatment Panel III, SCORE [Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation] project, Reynolds Risk Score, ASSIGN [Assessing Cardiovascular Risk to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network/SIGN to Assign Preventative Treatment], and QRISK [QRESEARCH Cardiovascular Risk Algorithm]) for outcomes, population derived/validated, receiver-operating characteristic, variables included, and limitations. Areas of uncertainty include 10-year versus lifetime risk, prediction of CVD or coronary heart disease end points, nonlaboratory-based risk scores, age at which to start, race and sex differences, and whether a risk score should guide therapy. We believe that the best high-risk approach to CVD evaluation and prevention lies in routine testing for cardiovascular risk factors and risk score assessment. We recommend that health care providers discuss the global cardiovascular risk and lifetime cardiovascular risk score assessment with each patient to better explain each patient's future risk. Appropriate intervention, guided by risk assessment, has the potential to bring about a significant reduction in population levels of risk.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
