Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
DNA testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a cost-effectiveness model
Sarah Wordsworth1, José Leal, Edward Blair
1Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. sarah.wordsworth@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Insights
Genetic screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is more cost-effective than clinical screening for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD). This approach identifies more at-risk individuals, proving valuable for primary prevention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Health Economics
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the leading genetic heart condition and a primary cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals.
- Screening family members is crucial for identifying at-risk individuals and enabling preventative strategies.
- Current screening often relies on clinical assessments, but the effectiveness of genetic approaches is under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cascade genetic screening compared to cascade clinical screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- To determine the most economically viable strategy for identifying individuals at risk of SCD due to HCM.
Main Methods:
- An economic decision model was utilized to compare cascade screening strategies.
- The model contrasted genetic testing approaches with traditional clinical assessment methods.
- Key economic metrics, such as the incremental cost per life year saved, were calculated.
Main Results:
- Cascade genetic screening demonstrated a favorable incremental cost per life year saved (€14,397) compared to cascade clinical screening.
- Genetic diagnostic strategies were found to be more cost-effective than relying solely on clinical tests.
- While initial costs for molecular genetic testing were slightly higher, its superior effectiveness in identifying at-risk individuals justified the investment.
Conclusions:
- Integrating molecular genetic information into the diagnosis and management of HCM represents a cost-effective strategy.
- This approach is highly effective for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in families affected by HCM.
- Genetic screening offers a superior and economically sound method for managing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Abstract:
Aims To explore the cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of screening family members for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common monogenic cardiac disorder and the most frequent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people. Methods and results Economic decision model comparing cascade screening by genetic, as opposed to clinical methods. The incremental cost per life year saved was 14,397 euro for the cascade genetic compared with the cascade clinical approach. Genetic diagnostic strategies are more likely to be cost-effective than clinical tests alone. The costs for cascade molecular genetic testing were slightly higher than clinical testing in the short run, but this was largely because the genetic approach is more effective and identifies more individuals at risk. Conclusion The use of molecular genetic information in the diagnosis and management of HCM is a cost-effective approach to the primary prevention of SCD in these patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

