Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A TAD-informed aging-brain xQTL atlas of multi-modal and cell-type-resolved regulatory variation.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Combining post-mortem and neuroimaging measures of brain amyloidosis to accelerate genomic discovery.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Comprehensive adjudication identifies 111 high-confidence loci for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Identification of genetic modifiers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a genome-wide association study.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

Multiomic Profiling of 85 iPSC Lines from Familial Dementia Reveals Cellular Diversity and Regulators of Organoid Development.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Effect of Cognitive Reserve on Age at Symptom Onset and Cognitive Decline in Individuals With Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

A new statistic to evaluate imputation reliability.

Peng Lin1, Sarah M Hartz, Zhehao Zhang

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Plos One
|March 20, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new imputation quality score (IQS) effectively assesses genetic data accuracy. This score is crucial for handling low minor allele frequency (MAF) polymorphisms and combining datasets from different genotyping platforms.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical genomics

Background:

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) generate vast amounts of data.
  • Combining or expanding GWAS datasets is essential for many research questions.
  • Imputing genetic data is problematic for low minor allele frequency (MAF) polymorphisms and datasets from different genotyping platforms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a novel statistic, the imputation quality score (IQS).
  • Develop a method to differentiate well-imputed from poorly-imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
  • Address challenges in genetic data imputation for low MAF SNPs and cross-platform datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the imputation quality score (IQS) to adjust concordance between imputed and genotyped SNPs for chance.
  • Evaluated IQS performance across varying minor allele frequencies using Illumina genotyping data.
  • Assessed IQS utility in filtering poorly-imputed SNPs in datasets genotyped on different platforms by simulating case-control scenarios.

Main Results:

  • IQS values decreased significantly with lower minor allele frequencies, confirming its MAF adjustment capability.
  • Filtering SNPs with IQS < 0.9 in a cross-platform analysis corrected a distorted Q-Q plot and eliminated false positives.
  • Robustness checks showed high correlation (>0.99) of IQS values computed independently on different data subsets.

Conclusions:

  • The imputation quality score (IQS) effectively distinguishes high-quality from low-quality SNP imputations.
  • IQS is particularly valuable for improving imputation accuracy with low MAF SNPs.
  • IQS provides a reliable method for filtering and combining genetic data from disparate genotyping platforms.