Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability of score differences on Wechsler's intelligence scales.

A B Silverstein1

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study compares two formulas for reliability in intelligence tests like the WAIS-R and WISC-R. Corrected reliability scores are higher than previous ones, but still notably low for practical use.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CLUSTER ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL ORIENTATION INVENTORY ITEMS IN A PRISON SAMPLE.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Brief Report: Second-Order Cluster Analysis of Personal Orientation Inventory Items in a Prison Sample.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Criterion-related validity of a new classification scheme for institutionalized mentally retarded individuals.

Psychological reports·1991
Same author

Update on the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of principal components.

Psychological reports·1990
Same author

Critique of a Doppelt-type short form of the WAIS-R.

Journal of clinical psychology·1990
Same author

Notes on the reliability of Wechsler short forms.

Journal of clinical psychology·1990

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Test Reliability

Background:

  • Assessing the reliability of individual subtest scores against the average score is crucial for accurate psychological assessment.
  • Previous calculations of reliability for specific subtests on intelligence scales may have been inaccurate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability estimates derived from two distinct formulas for the difference between an individual subtest score and the average subtest score.
  • To identify and correct previously reported inaccuracies in reliability for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R), and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R).

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two reliability formulas.
  • Application of formulas to subtest score data from WAIS-R, WISC-R, and WPPSI-R.
  • Identification and explanation of artifacts in reliability calculations.

Main Results:

  • Corrected reliability estimates for the WAIS-R and WISC-R are significantly higher than previously reported incorrect values.
  • The apparent reversal of this trend for the WPPSI-R was identified as a calculation artifact.
  • A majority of the corrected reliability scores (over 75%) fall below 0.70, indicating low reliability.

Conclusions:

  • The accurate calculation of reliability for subtest score differences is essential for valid interpretations of intelligence test results.
  • Despite corrections, the reliability of many subtest score differences remains low, suggesting caution in their clinical application.
  • Further research may be needed to develop more robust methods for assessing subtest score reliability.

Related Experiment Videos