Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Introduction to special section on client-therapy interaction research.

V Shoham-Salomon1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Client-treatment interaction in the study of differential change processes.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1991
Same author

Identification of patients at risk for nonresponse and negative outcome in psychotherapy.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1990
Same author

Interrelating research processes of process research.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1990
Same author

Paradoxical interventions: a meta-analysis.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1987
Same author

Are schizophrenics' behaviors schizophrenic? What medically versus psychosocially oriented therapists attribute to schizophrenic persons.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1985

This research explores the disconnect between common beliefs and scientific evidence on therapy effectiveness. It examines interactional research challenges and suggests new study approaches for better understanding treatment outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Therapeutic Interventions
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • A notable discrepancy exists between intuitive assumptions and empirical evidence regarding the varying effectiveness of different therapies.
  • Interactional research, crucial for understanding therapeutic dynamics, faces significant conceptual and methodological hurdles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the gap between intuition and research on differential therapy effectiveness.
  • To identify and discuss common conceptual and methodological issues in interactional research.
  • To propose alternative research strategies for advancing the study of therapeutic interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Review and conceptual analysis of existing interactional research.
  • Identification of common methodological and conceptual challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of alternative research designs and strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • The study highlights significant conceptual and methodological limitations in current interactional research.
    • A critical analysis reveals inconsistencies in how therapy effectiveness is studied and understood.
    • Alternative research strategies are proposed to overcome existing limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Bridging the gap between intuition and research requires addressing fundamental issues in interactional research methodology.
    • Adopting novel research strategies is essential for a more accurate understanding of differential therapy effectiveness.
    • Further research is needed to validate and implement proposed alternative strategies in the field of psychotherapy research.