Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.'s verdict
1Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106.
Abstract:
Although most reviews of comparative psychotherapy literature have failed to find significant differences among treatments, it is premature to give up the search for differential effects. There are a large number of patient, therapist, and treatment variables that may mediate the effects of treatments. Given the enormity of the task of exploring potential interactions among the many patient, therapist, and psychotherapy types, a guiding model is needed by which to narrow our search for variables that mediate between treatment type and outcome. However, theoretical constructs that represent both patient and therapy variations frequently are poorly defined. Tests of treatment selection models that cut across narrow theoretical differences among psychotherapies and that operationalize definitions of patient types hold promise for revealing meaningful Patient x Therapist interaction effects in psychotherapy.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Comparison Tests

