Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binaural modulation masking.

D W Grantham1, S P Bacon

  • 1Bill Wilkerson Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated auditory masking with modulated noise, finding a binaural advantage in detecting signals when modulation frequencies differ. This binaural advantage, or masking-level difference, highlights the brain

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral precursors on overshoot.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Contributions of suppression and excitation to simultaneous masking: effects of signal frequency and masker-signal frequency relation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

On the decline in overshoot at high masker levels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral precursors on the temporal effect in simultaneous masking with pure tones.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Temporal integration in the presence of off-frequency maskers.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing in Hearing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory masking is crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
  • Sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noise is used to study auditory processing.
  • Binaural hearing offers advantages over monaural hearing in challenging acoustic environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure modulation thresholds for a SAM noise signal masked by another modulated noise.
  • To compare monaural and binaural masking patterns across various signal modulation frequencies.
  • To investigate the role of binaural processing, specifically the masking-level difference (MLD), in modulation masking.

Main Methods:

  • Three subjects participated in experiments measuring modulation detection thresholds.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monaural (one ear) and binaural (two ears) conditions were tested using SAM wideband noise.
  • Signal modulation frequency was varied while masker modulation frequency was fixed or varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Monaural masking showed a decrease as signal frequency diverged from masker frequency, with a low-frequency upturn.
    • Binaural masking did not exhibit the low-frequency upturn, showing continuous improvement as signal frequency decreased.
    • Significant binaural advantages (MLDs) were observed, particularly at low signal frequencies and on-frequency conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Binaural hearing provides a significant advantage in detecting modulated signals, especially when modulation frequencies differ.
    • The observed 'tuning' for modulation suggests temporal pattern discrimination, not critical-band filtering, plays a key role.
    • Binaural capacities like interaural intensity difference (IID) detection and correlation discrimination contribute to masking release.