Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
[Efficacy of anticoagulation on patency post-permanent inferior vena caval filter placements]
Yong-le Xu1, Guo-xiang Dong, Jun Zhao
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Insights
Anticoagulation does not improve the patency of permanent inferior vena caval filters (IVCFs). This study found no significant difference in filter patency rates between anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated patients with deep vein thrombosis.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Thrombosis Management
- Medical Device Efficacy
Context:
- Inferior vena caval filters (IVCFs) are used to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- The long-term efficacy of anticoagulation in maintaining IVCF patency remains a subject of investigation.
- This retrospective study analyzed data from patients undergoing permanent IVCF placement between 2001 and 2007.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the impact of anticoagulation on the patency of permanent inferior vena caval filters (IVCFs) in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
Summary:
- A retrospective review of 138 patients with permanent IVCFs for DVT was conducted, dividing them into non-anticoagulation, short-term anticoagulation (warfarin < 6 months), and long-term anticoagulation (warfarin > 6 months) groups.
- Statistical analysis using chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences in filter patency rates or cumulative patency over time between the three groups.
- Filter thromboembolism occurred in 13.8% of patients, with no statistically significant variation in patency based on anticoagulation status.
Impact:
- The findings suggest that anticoagulation does not offer a significant benefit in maintaining the patency of permanent IVCFs.
- This research may influence clinical guidelines regarding the use of anticoagulation in conjunction with permanent IVCF placement.
- Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results and explore alternative strategies for optimizing IVCF patency.
Objective:
To discuss the efficacy of anticoagulation on patency post-permanent inferior vena caval filter (IVCF) placements.
Methods:
The patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity who were accepted permanent IVCF placement from December 2001 to December 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Data on vital status, filter thromboembolism, anticoagulation time, and so on were obtained through follow-up. One hundred and thirty eight patients (75 male and 63 female) with a mean age of 65 years were enrolled in the study. All the patients were divided into non-anticoagulation group, anticoagulation group A with taking warfarin less than 6 months, or anticoagulation group B with taking warfarin more than 6 months. chi(2) test, t test, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, Log-rank test were used for statistics analysis.
Results:
Sixteen patients died, and 1 of them died of pulmonary embolism. Including the 1 patient mentioned before, there were 19 patients (13.8%) suffered from filter thromboembolism. Upon chi(2) test, there were no significant differences (P = 0.288) on the patency rates between non-anticoagulation, anticoagulation group A and anticoagulation group B (87.8%, 75.0%, and 88.3% respectively). Upon Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there were still no significant differences (P = 0.227) on the mean patency time and the cumulate rates of patency at the 1st or 3rd year between the 3 groups (87.1%, 80.0%, 94.8% and 87.1%, 74.3%, 85.4% respectively).
Conclusion:
Anticoagulation has no efficacy on patency post-permanent IVCF placements.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management

