Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does good peer review assure good epidemiology?

J S Andrews1

  • 1Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Public Health Service, Atlanta, Georgia.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Public trust in research hinges on efficient, beneficial, and ethical studies. Peer review of research protocols and findings is a key method to enhance scientific quality and public confidence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Meaningfulness in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. A Report from the EU-US CTAD Task Force.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

Dependence Levels as Interim Clinical Milestones Along the Continuum of Alzheimer's Disease: 18-Month Results from the GERAS Observational Study.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2017
Same author

Clinical and Economic Characteristics of Milestones along the Continuum of Alzheimer's Disease: Transforming Functional Scores into Levels of Dependence.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2017
Same author

Clinical evolution of beta cell function in youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study.

Diabetologia·2012
Same author

The effects of serotonergic drugs on short-term spatial memory in rats.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

Unworthy parental attitudes toward mental defectives.

American journal of mental deficiency·2010

Area of Science:

  • Scientific integrity
  • Research ethics
  • Public health

Background:

  • Public demands for efficient, beneficial, and ethical research.
  • Need for mechanisms to ensure research quality and public trust.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the role of peer review in scientific research.
  • To explain how peer review can enhance research quality and public confidence.

Main Methods:

  • Peer review of research protocols.
  • Peer review of research results.
  • Peer review of research reports.

Main Results:

  • Peer review improves the quality of research.
  • Peer review enhances the ethical conduct of research.
  • Peer review reassures the public about research integrity.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review is essential for maintaining public trust in science.
  • Implementing robust peer review processes is crucial for responsible research conduct.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos