Related Experiment Videos
A code of ethical conduct for epidemiologists?
1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1991
Summary
Epidemiologists follow unwritten ethical standards, but a written code of ethics could clarify professional norms. Developing an enforceable code presents challenges but offers significant benefits for ethical conduct in epidemiology.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Bioethics
Background:
- Epidemiology currently lacks a formal written code of ethics.
- Unwritten ethical standards are taught and enforced through scientific and legal channels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the desirability and feasibility of establishing a written code of ethics for epidemiologists.
- To discuss the potential benefits and challenges of formalizing ethical guidelines in epidemiology.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and discussion of existing ethical practices in epidemiology.
- Analysis of arguments for and against a written code of ethics.
Main Results:
- The absence of a written code does not indicate unethical practice, but unwritten norms exist.
- Arguments for a code focus on theoretical advantages and clarifying professional conduct.
- Concerns exist regarding the feasibility and enforceability of a written code.
Conclusions:
- A written code of ethics, though challenging to develop, could provide valuable guidance comparable to written laws.
- Broad participation is crucial for the success of efforts to draft a code of ethics for epidemiologists.