Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for stenotic lesions after Kawasaki disease
1Department of Pediatrics, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan. qze0534@nifty.com
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) shows better long-term efficacy than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for Kawasaki disease patients, with significantly fewer repeat revascularization procedures needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Kawasaki disease can lead to coronary artery stenosis.
- Long-term outcomes of revascularization strategies for these lesions are critical.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for treating coronary artery stenosis after Kawasaki disease.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide survey of Japanese pediatricians in hospitals with >=100 beds was conducted.
- Data were collected via questionnaires, with a 82% return rate (1347/1637).
- Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause death and Q-wave myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoint: repeat revascularization.
Main Results:
- 67 patients received PCI, and 81 received CABG.
- No significant difference in primary endpoints between PCI and CABG (HR 1.35; P=.7).
- PCI group had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization (HR 2.23; P=.04), especially in younger patients (<12 years) with ischemic changes.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrates lower long-term efficacy compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Kawasaki disease patients.
- Increased need for repeat revascularization procedures is a key factor contributing to PCI's lower efficacy.
Objective:
To compare the long-term efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for stenotic lesions after Kawasaki disease.
Study Design:
Questionnaires were sent to pediatricians in Japan in hospitals with 100 or more beds. A total of 1637 questionnaires were sent, and 1347 (82%) were returned. The primary endpoints of the study were the composite of deaths from any cause and the Q-wave myocardial infarction. The secondary endpoints were the repeat-revascularization for the target vessel.
Results:
A total of 67 patients underwent PCI and 81 patients underwent CABG. Although the rates of the primary endpoints did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio 1.35 [95% confidence interval 0.29 to 6.32], P=.7), the rate of the secondary endpoints in the PCI group was significantly higher than that in the CABG group (hazard ratio 2.23 [95% confidence interval 1.04 to 4.76], P=.04). The benefit with CABG for the secondary endpoints was notable in patients younger than 12 years old, and who had ischemic change.
Conclusions:
PCI after Kawasaki disease resulted in a lower efficacy in comparison to CABG because of increased repeat-revascularization procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

