Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeted Delivery of Microneurotrophin BNN27 via Biomaterial Grafts Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells After Optic Nerve Injury.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2025
Same author

A device for high-throughput monitoring of degradation in soft tissue samples.

Journal of biomechanics·2018
Same author

Quantifying Cartilage Biomechanical Properties Using a Linearized Frequency-Domain Method.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2017
Same author

Cyclic tensile strain enhances human mesenchymal stem cell Smad 2/3 activation and tenogenic differentiation in anisotropic collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds.

European cells & materials·2017
Same author

Surface biology of collagen scaffold explains blocking of wound contraction and regeneration of skin and peripheral nerves.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2015
Same author

Preparation of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers for tissue regeneration.

Methods in molecular medicine·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Three-Dimensional In Vitro Biomimetic Model of Neuroblastoma Using Collagen-Based Scaffolds
07:48

Three-Dimensional In Vitro Biomimetic Model of Neuroblastoma Using Collagen-Based Scaffolds

Published on: July 9, 2021

Biologically active collagen-based scaffolds: advances in processing and characterization.

I V Yannas1, D S Tzeranis, B A Harley

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. yannas@mit.edu

Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|March 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Type I collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds (collagen-GAG scaffolds) promote organ regeneration by blocking scar formation. Processing and structural features influence their biological activity and clinical use.

More Related Videos

Three-dimensional Biomimetic Technology: Novel Biorubber Creates Defined Micro- and Macro-scale Architectures in Collagen Hydrogels
12:07

Three-dimensional Biomimetic Technology: Novel Biorubber Creates Defined Micro- and Macro-scale Architectures in Collagen Hydrogels

Published on: February 12, 2016

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Three-Dimensional In Vitro Biomimetic Model of Neuroblastoma Using Collagen-Based Scaffolds
07:48

Three-Dimensional In Vitro Biomimetic Model of Neuroblastoma Using Collagen-Based Scaffolds

Published on: July 9, 2021

Three-dimensional Biomimetic Technology: Novel Biorubber Creates Defined Micro- and Macro-scale Architectures in Collagen Hydrogels
12:07

Three-dimensional Biomimetic Technology: Novel Biorubber Creates Defined Micro- and Macro-scale Architectures in Collagen Hydrogels

Published on: February 12, 2016

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Type I collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds (collagen-GAG scaffolds; CGSs) exhibit unique biological activity, inducing partial organ regeneration in adult mammals.
  • Two CGS formulations are currently utilized in clinical settings, highlighting their therapeutic potential.
  • CGSs function by inhibiting the typical adult healing response, which involves wound contraction and scar formation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify structural determinants of CGS biological activity.
  • To explore processing variables influencing scaffold properties.
  • To investigate recent advancements in CGS fabrication and characterization.

Main Methods:

  • Identification of structural determinants: fibroblast binding ligands, mean pore size, and degradation rate.
  • Analysis of processing variables: collagen fiber swelling kinetics, suspension freezing, and freeze-dried scaffold cross-linking.
  • Characterization techniques: confocal and nonlinear optical microscopy (NLOM) for pore structure analysis.
  • Mechanical and degradation studies.
  • Cell seeding experiments to assess contractile forces and scaffold-cell interactions.

Main Results:

  • Structural determinants like ligands, pore size, and degradation rate significantly impact CGS biological activity.
  • Processing variables such as swelling, freezing, and cross-linking affect these determinants.
  • Advanced fabrication techniques yield scaffolds with controlled pore size distribution and property gradients.
  • NLOM offers advantages over confocal microscopy for imaging cell-seeded CGSs, preserving surface ligands and reducing photodamage.
  • Cell-seeded scaffolds generate contractile forces, leading to scaffold strut buckling.

Conclusions:

  • CGSs hold significant promise for promoting organ regeneration by modulating the healing response.
  • Understanding and controlling structural and processing parameters are crucial for optimizing CGS efficacy.
  • Advanced imaging techniques like NLOM are vital for in-depth analysis of CGS-cell interactions.
  • Further research into CGS mechanics and degradation is essential for clinical translation.