Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vibrating Concrete01:19

Vibrating Concrete

Mechanical vibrators are instrumental in compacting newly poured concrete within formwork and around reinforcements. This process is essential to eliminate trapped air pockets and establish a dense concrete mass. One widely used method is vibrating by internal vibrators, often referred to as a poker vibrator or immersion vibrator. It is rapidly inserted through the full depth of the freshly laid concrete and slightly extends into the layer below it (which remains in a plastic state). Consistent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Human-Centered Multimodal Framework for Characterizing Safety-Relevant Driver Functional Domains: An Exploratory Study of Professional Bus Drivers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Designing Sustainable workplaces: the strategic role of ergonomics and employee well-being.

Ergonomics·2026
Same author

Applying multiscale entropy for evaluating website visual complexity in an agile project: Using physiological data.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Learning performance and physiological feedback-based evaluation for human-robot collaboration.

Applied ergonomics·2024
Same author

Building a Low-Cost Wireless Biofeedback Solution: Applying Design Science Research Methodology.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment.

Chiuhsiang Joe Lin1, Chi No Liu, Chin Jung Chao

  • 1Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li, Taiwan. hsiang@cycu.edu.tw

Ergonomics
|March 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary

In static conditions, touch screens perform best. However, a mouse is superior in simulated vehicle vibration environments, outperforming trackballs for human-computer interaction in dynamic settings.

More Related Videos

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Ergonomics
  • Vibration analysis

Background:

  • Evaluating input device performance in dynamic environments is crucial for user experience.
  • Vehicle vibration significantly impacts interaction tasks.
  • Existing research often focuses on static conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of touch screens, mice, and trackballs under simulated motion and vibration.
  • To identify the most effective pointing device for dynamic environments.
  • To provide data for designing human-computer interaction systems in vehicles.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Stewart motion platform to create a six-degree-of-freedom motion environment.
  • Simulated vehicle vibration conditions for participant testing.
  • Employed Fitts' Law tasks to measure movement time, error rate, index of performance, and throughput for each device.

Main Results:

  • Touch screens yielded the best performance in static conditions.
  • Mice demonstrated superior performance in the simulated vibration environment.
  • Trackballs consistently showed the poorest performance among the tested devices.
  • Touch screen error rates and endpoint variation increased significantly under vibration.

Conclusions:

  • Device selection for human-computer interaction is context-dependent, especially in dynamic environments.
  • Mice are recommended for use in environments with significant vibration, such as vehicles.
  • Further research may explore adaptive interfaces for dynamic conditions.