Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method for introducing standardized (simulated) patients into general practice consultations.

J J Rethans1, R Drop, F Sturmans

  • 1Centre for Quality Assurance in Research in General Practice, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What programmatic assessment in medical education can learn from healthcare.

Perspectives on medical education·2017
Same author

Development of knowledge tests for multi-disciplinary emergency training: a review and an example.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2014
Same author

Mutations in the VEGFR3 signaling pathway explain 36% of familial lymphedema.

Molecular syndromology·2013
Same author

Computer-supported collaborative learning in the medical workplace: Students' experiences on formative peer feedback of a critical appraisal of a topic paper.

Medical teacher·2011
Same author

Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2009
Same author

[Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2008

Standardized patients, or simulated patients, can assess general practitioner performance undetected in healthcare. This study confirms the feasibility of the standardized patient method for evaluating doctor performance.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Health Services Research
  • Primary Care

Background:

  • Assessing general practitioner (GP) performance is crucial for healthcare quality.
  • Traditional methods for evaluating GPs have limitations.
  • A novel approach using standardized patients (SPs) is explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the feasibility of using undetected standardized patients to assess GP performance.
  • To detail the methodology for implementing SP visits in primary care settings.
  • To evaluate patient and doctor reactions to the SP methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a detailed, step-by-step methodology for SP preparation and execution.
  • Systematic training of SPs to portray specific clinical scenarios accurately.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Deployment of SPs in 156 consultations across 39 general practices.

    • Main Results:

    • Standardized patients were not detected in any of the 156 consultations.
    • No participating general practitioners reported feeling offended by the SPs.
    • All doctors expressed willingness to participate in future SP studies.

    Conclusions:

    • The standardized patient method is a feasible and effective tool for assessing general practitioner performance.
    • The detailed methodology ensures SPs can operate undetected within healthcare systems.
    • This approach offers a valuable, non-offending method for quality improvement in primary care.