Clinical utility of high-resolution portal films

We have evaluated the film quality and overall clinical utility of a unique high-resolution portal film system which utilizes high contrast graphics art film. A total of 127 unselected patients had their conventional portal films and high-resolution films of the same site, compared and graded subjectively for a variety of parameters by an independent panel of radiotherapists and radiographers. Although consistent improvements in most aspects of image quality were noted, improved overall clinical usefulness of the high-resolution portal film system in comparison to the conventional films, when subjected to multiple regression analysis, was confined to lateral neck views only. High-resolution portal film utility was also found to depend significantly on field size with areas less than 110 cm2 having a markedly worse clinical utility score.