Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visualization and detection-localization on computed tomographic images.

S E Seltzer1, R G Swensson, R D Nawfel

  • 1Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Investigative Radiology
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Reply</i>.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same author

Measured Head CT/CTA Skin Dose and Intensive Care Unit Patient Cumulative Exposure.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same author

CT reconstruction techniques for improved accuracy of lung CT airway measurement.

Medical physics·2014
Same author

Reference standard and statistical model for intersite and temporal comparisons of CT attenuation in a multicenter quantitative lung study.

Medical physics·2012
Same author

Safety of ERCP during pregnancy.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2003
Same author

Comment on "in x-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size".

Medical physics·2002
Same journal

Accelerated Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction for 3D T2 Dark-Fluid in Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Body Imaging: Technical Basis, Current Applications, and Future Directions.

Investigative radiology·2026
See all related articles

Detecting liver lesions on CT scans is challenging, even when visible. Accurate localization is hindered by potential confusion with normal anatomical structures like blood vessels.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Accuracy

Background:

  • Liver lesions require accurate detection and localization for effective patient management.
  • Computed tomographic (CT) imaging is a primary modality for visualizing liver abnormalities.
  • Observer performance in image interpretation is influenced by lesion characteristics and image complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of lesion location and polarity on the detection and localization of liver lesions in CT images.
  • To determine if high visibility of liver lesions guarantees accurate localization by observers.
  • To identify factors that constrain observer performance in localizing liver lesions on CT scans.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic investigation of observer performance in detecting and locating simulated liver lesions on CT images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation of lesion polarity (hyperdense or hypodense relative to liver parenchyma) and anatomical location.
  • Analysis of localization accuracy considering potential confusions with normal anatomical structures.

    • Main Results:

    • Lesion visibility alone does not ensure accurate localization.
    • Observer performance is significantly constrained by the potential for misinterpreting normal anatomical structures (e.g., blood vessels) as lesions.
    • Localization accuracy is affected by both lesion location and its contrast characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate localization of liver lesions on CT requires more than just high visibility.
    • The presence of similar-appearing normal structures poses a significant challenge to precise lesion localization.
    • Further research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate diagnostic errors related to lesion localization in liver CT interpretation.