Understanding relations among early family environment, cortisol response, and child aggression via a prevention

Colleen R O'Neal1, Laurie Miller Brotman, Keng-Yen Huang

  • 1NYU Child Study Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. onealc01@nyumc.org

Child Development
|March 25, 2010
PubMed

Insights

This study found that for children with low family warmth, an intervention reduced aggression by lowering their cortisol response. This highlights the link between stress hormones and behavior in at-risk youth.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Child Psychiatry

Background:

  • Family environment significantly influences child development and behavior.
  • Cortisol response, a biomarker of stress, is implicated in behavioral regulation.
  • Children at risk for antisocial behavior often exhibit altered stress reactivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between family environment, cortisol response, and behavior in children at risk for antisocial behavior.
  • To determine if changes in cortisol response mediate the intervention's effect on child aggression.
  • To explore the role of cortisol response in intervention-related changes in child engaging behavior.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 92 children (mean age 48 months) at risk for antisocial behavior.
  • Assessment of family environment, cortisol response to a social challenge, and child behavior (aggression, engaging behavior).
  • Mediation analysis to examine the role of cortisol response in intervention effects.

Main Results:

  • The intervention significantly reduced aggression in children from lower warmth families.
  • This reduction in aggression was largely mediated by a decrease in cortisol response.
  • While the intervention improved engaging behavior, cortisol response did not mediate this outcome.

Conclusions:

  • Cortisol response is a significant mediator linking interventions to reduced aggression in at-risk children, particularly within low-warmth family environments.
  • Findings underscore the importance of considering both family context and physiological stress responses in addressing child antisocial behavior.
  • The study provides evidence for the utility of interventions targeting stress regulation to improve behavioral outcomes in vulnerable children.

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences01:28

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

Social behavior is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction between biological predispositions and environmental influences. This intricate interplay shapes how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts. Understanding these mechanisms requires insights from psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary theory.Environmental Influences on Social BehaviorEnvironmental factors, including temperature, odors, and visual stimuli, play a crucial role in shaping...
Relationship with Parents: Attachment01:28

Relationship with Parents: Attachment

Parent-child interactions lay the foundation for how we understand relationships throughout life. These interactions are not uniform across families; instead, they are shaped by a range of environmental, emotional, and behavioral factors unique to each caregiver-child dynamic. Social psychologists study these early relationships to understand how patterns formed in infancy influence social functioning and interpersonal behavior in adulthood.Attachment Theory and Early Relational ModelsJohn...
Bullying02:04

Bullying

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
Physiological Foundation of Stress01:24

Physiological Foundation of Stress

Stress triggers a coordinated physiological response involving the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This dual activation ensures that the body is prepared for both immediate and prolonged stress management. The process begins with the perception of a stressor. This initial phase activates the SNS, leading to the rapid release of adrenaline (epinephrine) from the adrenal glands.
Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System
Adrenaline triggers the...
Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis01:37

Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis

The response to stress—be it physical or psychological, acute or chronic—involves activation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis. The HPA axis is part of the neuroendocrine system because it involves both neuronal and hormonal communication. Its function is to regulate homeostatic systems—metabolic, cardiovascular, and immune—providing the necessary means to respond to a stressor.