Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Apoptosis and turnover disruption of olfactory sensory neurons in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience·2024
Same author

Tryptophan metabolism in digestive system tumors: unraveling the pathways and implications.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2024
Same author

Medication self-management capacity among older adults living in low-income housing communities.

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA·2024
Same author

Association between body stature with ocular biometrics and refraction among Chinese preschoolers.

BMC ophthalmology·2024
Same author

The interaction between intratumoral bacteria and metabolic distortion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Journal of translational medicine·2024
Same author

Diabetes Promotes Myocardial Fibrosis via AMPK/EZH2/PPAR-γ Signaling Pathway.

Diabetes & metabolism journal·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A method for reducing misclassification in the extended Glasgow Outcome Score.

Juan Lu1, Anthony Marmarou, Kate Lapane

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0508, USA. jlu1@vcu.edu

Journal of Neurotrauma
|March 26, 2010
PubMed
Summary

A new rating system for the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) significantly reduces rater disagreements in traumatic brain injury (TBI) trials. This improved method enhances consistency in outcome assessment for TBI research.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Background:

  • The extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) is a standard outcome measure in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical trials.
  • Conventional GOSE assessment via structured interviews shows significant inter-rater variation, impacting trial reliability.
  • Reducing this variation is crucial for accurate TBI outcome assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate an alternate GOSE rating system designed to minimize inter-rater variation.
  • To compare the effectiveness of the alternate system, with and without central quality control, against conventional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Forty-five trauma centers were randomized into three groups.
  • Group 1 used the alternate GOSE system with central quality control.
  • Group 2 used the alternate system alone.
  • Group 3 used conventional structured interviews.
  • Inter-rater agreement was assessed using raw agreement and weighted kappa statistics.

Main Results:

  • The alternate GOSE system with central monitoring achieved the highest inter-rater agreement (97% for GOS, 97% for GOSE).
  • Conventional methods and the alternate system alone showed lower agreement rates (e.g., 63% for GOSE without central review).
  • The alternate system provides structured narratives for improved central review.

Conclusions:

  • The alternate GOSE rating system, especially with central quality control, substantially reduces inter-rater variation in TBI trials.
  • This method enhances the reliability and consistency of GOSE assessments.
  • The system offers improved documentation and facilitates central review, benefiting TBI research.