Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Published on: September 11, 2018

Science or slaughter: need for lethal sampling of sharks.

M R Heupel¹, C A Simpfendorfer

¹School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia. michelle.heupel@jcu.edu.au

Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

|March 27, 2010

Summary

Lethal sampling of sharks provides crucial data for conservation, despite ethical concerns. Scientific evidence, free from external pressures, should guide decisions on its use to protect vulnerable shark populations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Shark depredation: future directions in research and management.

Reviews in fish biology and fisheries·2022

Same author

Diurnal activity patterns and habitat use of juvenile Pastinachus ater in a coral reef flat environment.

PloS one·2020

Same author

Elasmobranch bycatch in the demersal prawn trawl fishery in the Gulf of Papua, Papua New Guinea.

Scientific reports·2019

Same author

The importance of sample size in marine megafauna tagging studies.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2019

Same author

Convergence of marine megafauna movement patterns in coastal and open oceans.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018

Same author

Crossing lines: a multidisciplinary framework for assessing connectivity of hammerhead sharks across jurisdictional boundaries.

Scientific reports·2017

Area of Science:

Marine Biology
Conservation Science
Fisheries Management

Background:

Growing public and commercial interest in shark populations necessitates scientific data for effective management and conservation.
Nonscientific influences (public, political, media) increasingly impact research and conservation priorities for marine vertebrates.
Significant data gaps exist for nearly half of known shark species, hindering accurate population status assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the implications of nonscientific influences on shark research, specifically addressing the justification of lethal sampling.
To evaluate the necessity of lethal sampling for collecting essential life-history data.
To advocate for science-based decision-making in shark conservation, free from external pressures.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

Environmental DNA Sampling from Whale-Watching Vessels for Cetacean Monitoring

Environmental DNA Sampling from Whale-Watching Vessels for Cetacean Monitoring

Published on: April 10, 2026

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Published on: September 11, 2018

Environmental DNA Sampling from Whale-Watching Vessels for Cetacean Monitoring

Environmental DNA Sampling from Whale-Watching Vessels for Cetacean Monitoring

Published on: April 10, 2026

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

Review of existing scientific literature and conservation practices for marine vertebrates.
Analysis of the trade-offs between the costs of lethal sampling and its conservation benefits.
Assessment of the current capabilities and limitations of nonlethal data collection techniques.

Main Results:

Lethal sampling, while costly to populations, provides essential data unobtainable through other current methods.
Nonlethal techniques for collecting life-history data are developing but not yet sufficient for widespread application.
Decisions regarding lethal sampling must be scientifically informed to ensure the future of all shark populations.

Conclusions:

Continued development of nonlethal methods and coordinated use of samples from lethal sampling are crucial.
Prioritizing scientifically objective research, independent of external pressures, is vital for effective shark conservation.
Addressing data deficiencies for shark populations requires ongoing scientific data collection, including judicious use of lethal sampling when necessary.