Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Level of evidence for promising subgroup findings: The case of trends and multiple subgroups.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial.

The Lancet. Neurology·2018
Same author

Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation.

BMC medical research methodology·2018
Same author

Dynamic borrowing through empirical power priors that control type I error.

Biometrics·2017
Same author

European regulatory use and impact of subgroup evaluation in marketing authorisation applications.

Drug discovery today·2017
Same author

Electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoduodenal feeding tubes versus endoscopic placement: a randomized, multicenter trial.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2017
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive trial design and interim decision-making using incomplete longitudinal measurements: Methods and application to myasthenia gravis.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: From general theory to practical insights.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Estimating clinical trial hazard functions.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool.

Ingeborg van der Tweel1, Casper Bollen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Julius Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.vandertweel@umcutrecht.nl

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|March 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sequential meta-analysis (SMA) offers advantages over trial sequential analysis (TSA) for cumulative meta-analysis. SMA quantifies power, allows futility stopping, and provides adjusted estimates without needing a prior information size. This leads to ethical and economic benefits in research.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) informs decisions on initiating new studies.
  • Traditional methods lack adjustments for repeated hypothesis testing and power quantification.
  • Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was proposed to determine evidence thresholds in cumulative meta-analysis, requiring prior information size estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare trial sequential analysis (TSA) with sequential meta-analysis (SMA) using Whitehead's boundaries.
  • To evaluate the practical implications of each method in cumulative evidence synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of published examples comparing TSA and SMA.
  • Application of sequential meta-analysis (SMA) with Whitehead's boundaries.

Main Results:

  • Sequential meta-analysis (SMA) does not require a prior estimate of total information size.
  • SMA facilitates stopping cumulative meta-analyses for futility.
  • SMA quantifies statistical power and adjusts estimates for multiple testing.
  • SMA demonstrates efficiency gains for both efficacy and futility, offering ethical and economic advantages.

Conclusions:

  • Sequential meta-analysis (SMA) is a valuable tool for evaluating cumulative evidence from successive RCTs.
  • Estimates of between-trial variability can be unstable with few trials.
  • Further research is needed on the behavior of new estimation methods.