Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Reproducible Intensive Care Unit-Oriented Endotoxin Model in Rats
Published on: February 20, 2021
Polymicrobial sepsis and endotoxemia promote microvascular thrombosis via distinct mechanisms
K N Patel1, S H Soubra, F W Lam
1Medical Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Background:
We reported recently that endotoxemia promotes microvascular thrombosis in cremaster venules of wild-type mice, but not in mice deficient in toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) or von Willebrand factor (VWF).
Objective:
To determine whether the clinically relevant model of polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation/perforation (CLP) induces similar responses via the same mechanisms as endotoxemia.
Methods:
We used a light/dye-injury model of thrombosis in the cremaster microcirculation of wild-type mice and mice deficient in toll-like receptor-4 (C57BL/10ScNJ), toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), or VWF. Mice underwent CLP or sham surgery, or an intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (LPS) or saline. In the CLP model, we assessed the influence of fluid replacement on thrombotic responses.
Results:
Both CLP and LPS enhanced thrombotic occlusion in wild-type mice. In contrast to LPS, CLP enhanced thrombosis in TLR4- and VWF-deficient strains. While TLR2-deficient mice did not demonstrate enhanced thrombosis following CLP, LPS enhanced thrombosis in these mice. LPS, but not CLP, increased plasma VWF antigen relative to controls. Septic mice, particularly those undergoing CLP, developed significant hemoconcentration. Intravenous fluid replacement with isotonic saline prevented the hemoconcentration and prothrombotic responses to CLP, though fluids did not prevent the prothrombotic response to LPS.
Conclusions:
Polymicrobial sepsis induced by CLP and endotoxemia promote microvascular thrombosis via distinct mechanisms; enhanced thrombosis induced by CLP requires TLR2 but not TLR4 or VWF. The salutary effects of intravenous fluid replacement on microvascular thrombosis in polymicrobial sepsis remain to be characterized.
Insights
Polymicrobial sepsis and endotoxemia cause microvascular thrombosis through different pathways. Sepsis-induced thrombosis requires toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), not TLR4 or VWF, and is mitigated by fluid replacement.
Area of Science:
- Vascular biology
- Immunology
- Sepsis research
Background:
- Endotoxemia promotes microvascular thrombosis in wild-type mice.
- This effect is absent in mice lacking toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) or von Willebrand factor (VWF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if polymicrobial sepsis, induced by cecal ligation/perforation (CLP), causes similar microvascular thrombosis responses as endotoxemia.
- To determine if these responses involve the same biological mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of wild-type mice with TLR4-, TLR2-, and VWF-deficient mice.
- Induction of thrombosis using a light/dye-injury model in the cremaster microcirculation.
- Administration of CLP, sham surgery, endotoxin (LPS), or saline, with assessment of fluid replacement effects in the CLP model.
Main Results:
- Both CLP and LPS increased thrombotic occlusion in wild-type mice.
- CLP, unlike LPS, induced thrombosis in TLR4- and VWF-deficient mice.
- CLP-induced thrombosis was absent in TLR2-deficient mice, while LPS still induced thrombosis in these mice. Fluid replacement prevented CLP-induced thrombosis and hemoconcentration but not LPS-induced thrombosis.
Conclusions:
- Polymicrobial sepsis (CLP) and endotoxemia (LPS) promote microvascular thrombosis via distinct mechanisms.
- CLP-induced thrombosis requires TLR2, but not TLR4 or VWF.
- Intravenous fluid replacement benefits microvascular thrombosis in sepsis, but the precise mechanisms require further study.
More Related Videos
07:05Visualization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Mesenteric Venules After Mesenteric Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Intravital Microscopy
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:30Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Inflammation III: Local and Systemic Effects
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Determinants of Bacterial Pathogenicity and Virulence
Endocarditis I: Introduction