Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams
Peter Oluf Andersen1, Michael Kammer Jensen, Anne Lippert
1Danish Institute for Medical Simulation, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark. poa@dadlnet.dk
Background:
Treating cardiac arrest is linked to the mutual performance of several health-care individuals' task coordination. Non-technical skills, including communication, leadership and team interaction, could improve sequencing the tasks in the cardiac arrest algorithm. Non-technical skills have been a part of crew resource management training, created to improve safety in aviation. This study aimed, first, to establish crew resource management and non-technical skill-based learning objectives and behavioural markers for the performance of multi-professional resuscitation teams; second, to develop a checklist and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the checklist; and, finally, to develop a simulation-based course including the checklist on behavioural markers, as a tool for learning and assessment.
Method:
A seven-step procedure was used. Findings from interviews with Advanced Life Support instructors and analysis of critical incidents were used to create learning objectives, assessment tools and course curriculum. Reliability and validity were tested by assessing digital versatile disc (DVD)-recorded simulated cardiac arrests.
Results:
A checklist with 22 behavioural markers based on nine learning objectives was developed and embedded in an 8-h full-scale simulation course. Inter-rater reliability of the checklist (intra-class correlation) was 0.9. Concurrent validity (intra-class correlation) was 0.93. Rate of agreement (0.58-0.91) and kappa values (0.03-0.82) on single items varied.
Conclusion:
A full-scale simulation course and a checklist with 22 behavioural markers were developed. Good inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the checklist were demonstrated. Single items on the checklist need refinement to improve accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

