Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in systemic medication in children and adolescents with JIA: why, when and which patterns.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Perspectives of Older Patients on the Complexity of Medication Use.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
Same author

Elements to assess the quality of information of case reports in pregnancy pharmacovigilance data-a ConcePTION project.

Frontiers in drug safety and regulation·2025
Same author

Group-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy to Reduce Psychological Distress and Improve Sleep in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MindIBD).

Inflammatory bowel diseases·2025
Same author

DosEmi study protocol: a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of pharmacokinetic-guided reduced dosing compared with conventional dosing of emicizumab in people with haemophilia A.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

Changes on clinical and participatory outcomes in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss after cochlear implantation: protocol of a multicentre prospective observational cohort study - Societal Merit of Intervention on Hearing Loss Evaluation (SMILE).

BMJ open·2023
Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Unpredictable bias when using the missing indicator method or complete case analysis for missing confounder values:

Mirjam J Knol1, Kristel J M Janssen, A Rogier T Donders

  • 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Str. 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.j.knol@umcutrecht.nl

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|March 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The missing indicator method (MIM) introduces unpredictable bias in effect estimates, even with minimal missing confounder data. Complete case analysis (CC) is suitable for completely random missing data but reduces statistical power.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methods

Background:

  • Handling missing confounder data is crucial in observational studies.
  • Missing indicator method (MIM) and complete case analysis (CC) are common approaches.
  • Multiple imputation (MI) is an alternative method for addressing missing data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the bias introduced by MIM and CC compared to MI.
  • To assess the impact of different missing data patterns on effect estimates.
  • To quantify the degree and direction of bias in odds ratio estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical data from a cohort study were used.
  • Exposure (marital status), outcome (depression), and confounders (age, sex, income) were selected.
  • Missing values were simulated in income data across various missingness patterns and percentages (2.5%-30%).

Main Results:

  • MIM resulted in overestimation of the odds ratio when missing values were completely random.
  • CC and MI yielded unbiased results under completely random missingness.
  • Both MIM and CC produced biased estimates (under- or overestimation) when missingness depended on observed values; bias magnitude and direction varied with missing data relationships to exposure and outcome, increasing with higher percentages of missing values.

Conclusions:

  • MIM is not recommended for handling missing confounder data due to unpredictable bias, even with small missing percentages.
  • CC is appropriate for completely random missing data but leads to a loss of statistical power.
  • The choice of method for handling missing data significantly impacts the validity of effect estimates in epidemiological research.