Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bibliotherapy revisited.

R J Riordan1

  • 1Department of Counseling, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.

Psychological Reports
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bibliotherapy, a clinical tool, lacks extensive research support as previously suggested. However, Pardeck

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gardening as a rehabilitation adjunct.

Journal of rehabilitationยท1983
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Clinical Practice
  • Mental Health Interventions

Background:

  • Bibliotherapy is a therapeutic approach utilizing reading materials for mental health.
  • Previous literature suggested substantial research backing for bibliotherapy.
  • The clinical application of bibliotherapy requires precise methodology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the research support for bibliotherapy.
  • To reassess the claims made regarding the evidence base of bibliotherapy.
  • To refine the understanding of bibliotherapy as a clinical intervention.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of existing research on bibliotherapy.
  • Comparison of current evidence with previous assertions on bibliotherapy's efficacy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of methodological rigor in bibliotherapy studies.

    • Main Results:

    • The research support for bibliotherapy is less extensive than previously implied.
    • Existing studies on bibliotherapy may not meet rigorous scientific standards.
    • Pardeck's work offers a more precise framework for bibliotherapy application.

    Conclusions:

    • Bibliotherapy's evidence base requires further development and validation.
    • Clinical use of bibliotherapy can be enhanced through more precise application.
    • Future research should focus on strengthening the empirical foundation of bibliotherapy.