Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
Published on: July 11, 2016
A comparison of automated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identification with current infection control
David Shepherd1, Jeff Friedlin, Shaun Grannis
1Regenstrief Institute, Inc., and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract:
Infections with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) account for almost 20,000 deaths per year. Early identification of patients with MRSA infection or colonization aids in stopping spread. We compared automated identification of MRSA using HL7 lab result messages to current manual infection control practices at a local hospital during July-September 2008. We used data from infection control providers (ICPs), the microbiology lab, and a Regional Healthcare Information Exchange to assess the accuracy of manual and automated methods. Three hundred seventy MRSA cases were identified from July-September 2008. Manual identification recognized 314 (sensitivity 84.9%, positive predictive value 99.4%) MRSA cases and automated detection from HL7 messages identified 341 (sensitivity 92.2%, positive predictive value 98.8%). Automated processing of HL7 lab report messages is a more sensitive method of capturing MRSA cases than current standard infection control practice, with minimal loss of specificity.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Methods of Classification and Identification
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Differential Staining Technique
