Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Intracranial stenting in atherosclerotic disease-recent results and challenges to face
Wiebke Kurre1, René Chapot, Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont
1Department of Neuroradiology, Alfried-Krupp-Krankenhaus, Alfried Krupp Strasse 21, 45131, Essen, Germany. wiebke.kurre@kgu.de
Insights
Intracranial stenting for symptomatic stenoses lacks randomized trial data, making clinical benefit debated. Current complication rates suggest endovascular treatment is not yet superior to medical therapy.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Intracranial stenting is an emerging add-on therapy for symptomatic stenoses.
- Clinical benefit remains debated due to a lack of randomized controlled trials.
- Treatment decisions rely on stroke risk with antiplatelet therapy versus registry data on stenting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current knowledge on intracranial stenting and medical therapy for symptomatic stenoses.
- To establish a foundation for patient selection in intracranial stenting procedures.
- To identify challenges and areas for improvement in endovascular treatment of intracranial stenoses.
Main Methods:
- Literature review summarizing current data on medical therapy and interventional stenting for intracranial stenoses.
- Analysis of existing case series and registry data for stent treatment outcomes.
- Evaluation of procedure-related complication rates and in-stent stenosis rates.
Main Results:
- The overall clinical benefit of intracranial stenting is not definitively established.
- Procedure-related complication rates and in-stent stenosis rates remain a concern.
- Endovascular treatment is not yet proven superior to medical therapy for symptomatic stenoses.
Conclusions:
- Optimization of patient selection, stent technology, and periprocedural management is crucial for endovascular treatment competitiveness.
- Current evidence suggests intracranial stenting should be limited to specialized neurovascular centers.
- Further research, particularly randomized trials, is needed to clarify the role of intracranial stenting.
Abstract:
Intracranial stenting is increasingly used as an add-on to medical therapy despite the fact that the overall clinical benefit remains a matter of debate, since we lack results of randomized trials. Decision making on interventional treatment is made on the grounds of the anticipated risk of stroke with antiplatelet medication on one hand and on the experience with stent treatment based on data from case series and registries on the other hand. This review will summarize the current knowledge on both topics serving as the fundament of patient selection for intracranial stenting. A second objective is to highlight some specific problems that are encountered when treating patients interventionally. Procedure-related complication rates and rates of in stent stenoses are still too high to be confident that endovascular treatment is superior to medical therapy of symptomatic stenoses. Optimization of patient selection criteria, stent technology, and periprocedural management are necessary to become undoubtedly competitive with antiplatelet therapy. With the current stage of development, interventional treatment of intracranial stenoses should be confined to specialized centers with a high expertise in neurovascular procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care