Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual sensitivity to spatially sampled modulation in human observers.

J B Mulligan1, D I MacLeod

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Vision Research
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory processing delays measured with the eye-movement correlogram.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2002
Same author

Retinal contrast losses and visual resolution with obliquely incident light.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001
Same author

Optimal nonlinear codes for the perception of natural colours.

Network (Bristol, England)·2001
Same author

Vision. Realignment of cones after cataract removal.

Nature·2001
Same author

Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns.

Nature·2001
Same author

Spatial and temporal properties of light adaptation in the rod system.

Vision research·2000
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Detecting visual luminance modulation is harder with discrete dots than continuous fields. This visual perception difference increases with dot spacing and modulation frequency.

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Visual perception
  • Spatial vision

Background:

  • Visual detection thresholds are influenced by the spatial arrangement of stimuli.
  • Previous research suggested compressive nonlinearities explain spatial sampling effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate spatial luminance modulation detection in dot lattices.
  • To understand how lattice spacing and modulation frequency affect detection thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Measuring detection thresholds for spatial luminance modulation in regular dot lattices.
  • Varying the spacing of lattice elements and modulation frequency.

Main Results:

  • Lattice detection thresholds are higher than continuous field thresholds, with elevations up to one log unit.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Largest threshold elevations observed at sample spacings of 12 arc minutes or greater.
  • Threshold elevations are frequency-dependent, increasing with higher modulation frequencies.

    • Conclusions:

    • Nonlinear saturation in an early, spatially opponent visual pathway stage explains the data.
    • Compressive nonlinearity theories do not fully account for the observed frequency dependence.
    • Masking of modulation frequency by lattice spatial frequencies is a potential explanation.