Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Extended Versions of Green’s Theorem01:27

Extended Versions of Green’s Theorem

Green’s Theorem connects the circulation of a vector field around a closed curve with the behavior of the field across the region enclosed by that curve. It provides a way to replace a line integral around a boundary with a double integral over the interior region, making it especially useful in plane geometry, fluid flow, and vector calculus.Although Green’s Theorem is often introduced using simple regions without gaps, it can also be applied to regions made from several simple parts. This...
Linearization and Approximation01:26

Linearization and Approximation

Linearization is a mathematical technique used to approximate complex, nonlinear functions with simpler linear models in the vicinity of a chosen reference point. The method is based on the idea that, although a function may be difficult to evaluate exactly, its behavior near a specific input value can often be closely approximated by the tangent line at that point. This approach is particularly useful when small deviations from a known value are involved.Consider the square root function, for...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transitive reasoning as linear classification.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Aging macaques bridge the translational gap in perivascular space biology.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Time-dependent changes in stepping performance and velocity following partial dopaminergic lesions in the SNc of male and female rats.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Shape tasting: A comparative evaluation of crossmodal correspondence in wine tasting.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Targeting dCas9-SunTag to a Susceptibility Gene Promoter Is Sufficient for CRISPR Interference.

Plant direct·2026
Same author

Aging macaques bridge the translational gap in perivascular space biology.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Barycentric extension of generalized matching.

Greg Jensen1, Allen Neuringer

  • 1Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, USA.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|April 1, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method to analyze choices with multiple options and significant biases, extending the Generalized Matching Model. The Barycentric Matching Model accurately describes animal behavior when reinforcer frequencies change.

Keywords:
barycentric analysesbiasconcurrent schedules of reinforcementgeneralized matchingmore than two choicesprobabilistic reinforcementrats

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Animal behavior studies
  • Reinforcement learning

Background:

  • Traditional choice studies use limited, identical options.
  • Real-world choices involve numerous alternatives and inherent biases.
  • Existing models struggle with complex choice environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel methodology for investigating choice behavior with multiple alternatives and substantial biases.
  • To extend the Generalized Matching Model to accommodate complex choice scenarios.
  • To quantify individual biases in operanda choice.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized twenty rats in a choice experiment with five distinct operanda (levers and pigeon keys).
  • Employed probabilistic and concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
  • Systematically varied reinforcer frequencies across operanda to generate biases.

Main Results:

  • The Barycentric Matching Model effectively described the rats' choices across varying reinforcer frequencies.
  • The model accurately estimated individual bias values for each operanda.
  • A single exponent captured the sensitivity to reinforcer ratios.

Conclusions:

  • The Barycentric Matching Model offers a robust framework for analyzing choice under concurrent schedules with multiple, biased alternatives.
  • This method provides a more realistic approach to studying decision-making in complex environments.
  • The findings advance our understanding of choice behavior and reinforcement learning.