Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same author

Association Between Discrimination in Health Care and ASCVD Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States.

Circulation. Population health and outcomes·2026
Same author

Real-World Comparability of Antiresorptive Osteoporosis Treatment Groups Among Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Women Ages 55 and Older in the United States.

Clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Methodological Challenges of Emulating a Target Trial to Assess Effectiveness of Timing of PCSK9 Inhibitor Treatment Initiation Post Myocardial Infarction.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same author

Can Contemporary Large Language Models Provide the Domain Knowledge Needed for Causal Inference? Evaluating Automated Causal Graph Discovery Through an ASCVD Case Study.

Clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Incidence and Prevalence of Low Back Pain in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Arthritis care & research·2025
Same journal

Effectiveness of Metformin in Preventing Colorectal Cancer Among Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Trends in Pharmacist-Prescribed Dispensing Records of HIV Pre-Exposure (2020-2025) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (2020-2024) in Brazil: A Time Series Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

French Consumption of Methylphenidate in Primary Care From 2016 to 2023, Impact of Prescribing Policy Changes-A Time-Series Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Uptake and Use of Biologic Therapies in Paediatric Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: An Australian Population-Based Study.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Fluoropyrimidines Versus FOLFOX as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Overlap-Weighted Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Association Between EGFR-TKI-Associated Skin Rash and Recorded Mortality in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Accounting for Immortal Time Bias.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research.

M Alan Brookhart1, Jeremy A Rassen, Sebastian Schneeweiss

  • 1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 27599-7435, USA. abrookhart@unc.edu

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
|April 1, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Instrumental variable (IV) methods offer a practical solution for uncontrolled confounding in medical research. These methods can be valuable for comparative effectiveness studies, especially when confounding is significant.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Uncontrolled confounding is a significant challenge in comparative studies of medical interventions.
  • Instrumental variable (IV) methods are a proposed solution but are not widely understood by researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a non-technical, practical introduction to IV methods for comparative safety and effectiveness research.
  • To explain the principles, assumptions, interpretation, and reporting standards for IV analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the principles and basic assumptions for valid IV estimation.
  • Discussion of how to interpret results from IV studies.
  • Overview of instruments used in comparative effectiveness research and suggested reporting standards.

Main Results:

  • IV methods may be underpowered for rare outcomes in drug safety studies.
  • IV methods can be potentially useful for studying intended effects where confounding is substantial.

Conclusions:

  • Instrumental variable methods provide a valuable, albeit complex, approach to address confounding in comparative medical research.
  • Further understanding and adoption of IV methods can enhance the reliability of comparative effectiveness and safety studies.