Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Retrospective study from Harare Central Maternity Hospital comparing symphysiotomies with Caesarean Sections for
1Harare Central Hospital, Zimbabwe, The Netherlands. verkuyl@freeler.nl
Objective:
To explore the possibility that in obstructed labour with a live baby, a delivery by symphysiotomy is an ethical option.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Teaching hospital with busy maternity wards.
Subjects:
Women in (nearly) second stage obstructed labour who were either delivered by Caesarean Section (79), or symphysiotomy, (172).
Main Outcome Measures:
Comparing perinatal mortality and morbidity and maternal complications, pain, long term morbidity and subsequent reproductive behaviour.
Results:
There is no evidence of more foetal mortality or morbidity after a symphysiotomy. Short term maternal morbidity is more serious after Caesarean Section. Long term maternal morbidity might be increased after symphysiotomies, compared with Caesarean Section. Because there are more repeat operative deliveries and trials of scar after a Caesarean Section, future maternal, foetal and infant mortality is higher.
Conclusion:
Rejection of symphysiotomies as an option for delivery in cases of obstructed labour is not evidence based. It is very likely that lives could be saved if symphysiotomies were taught in the sub-Saharan teaching hospitals and practiced in the district hospitals. Those who oppose symphysiotomies should provide the relevant data.
