Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026
11:18
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
[Performance indicators: the role of 'task uncertainty']
Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck1, Hester F Lingsma, Ewout W Steyerberg
1Erasmus MC, afd. Maatschappelijke Gezondheidszorg, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.m.vandishoeck@erasmusmc.nl
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|April 2, 2010
Summary
Task uncertainty significantly impacts the development of healthcare quality indicators. Outcome indicators are best for low-uncertainty conditions, while process indicators suit complex cases. Healthcare professional involvement is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Medical Rehabilitation
- Performance Measurement
Background:
- Quality of care is a key focus in healthcare, with performance indicators used for assessment.
- A debate exists regarding the efficacy of outcome versus process indicators in measuring care quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of task uncertainty in developing healthcare performance indicators.
- To determine the suitability of process versus outcome indicators based on task uncertainty.
Main Methods:
- A field study was conducted in a Dutch medical rehabilitation center.
- Four low task uncertainty teams and four high task uncertainty teams participated in developing performance indicators.
Main Results:
- Task uncertainty is a critical factor in selecting appropriate quality indicators.
- Outcome indicators are most effective for health problems with low variation and task uncertainty.
- Process indicators are more suitable for complex and uncertain medical tasks.
Conclusions:
- Healthcare professionals' participation is vital for developing effective quality indicators.
- The choice between process and outcome indicators should consider the level of task uncertainty.
- Understanding task uncertainty improves the development and application of quality of care metrics.
Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...