Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Gibbon Gestures: Hylobatid Facial Signals and Insights Into Language Evolution.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025

Same author

Bonobos and chimpanzees overlap in sexual behaviour patterns during social tension.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same author

Factors shaping socio-emotional trajectories in sanctuary-living bonobos: a longitudinal approach.

Royal Society open science·2024

Same author

The expression of empathy in human's closest relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees: current and future directions.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2024

Same author

Celebrating the 150th anniversary of the <i>Descent of Man</i>.

Evolutionary human sciences·2023

Same author

Primate socio-ecology shapes the evolution of distinctive facial repertoires.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Laboratory Method to Measure Contagious Yawning in Rats

A Laboratory Method to Measure Contagious Yawning in Rats

Published on: June 14, 2019

Methodological problems in the study of contagious yawning.

Matthew W Campbell, Frans B M de Waal

Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience

|April 2, 2010

Summary

Contagious yawning research faces challenges due to varied testing methods and analyses. Standardizing these approaches is crucial for accurate comparisons and advancing our understanding of yawning contagion and empathy.

Area of Science:

Psychology
Neuroscience
Animal Behavior

Background:

Contagious yawning is a complex phenomenon linked to empathy.
Current research faces challenges due to inconsistent methodologies and analytical approaches.
Variability in testing methods hinders direct comparison of study results.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight unresolved issues in contagious yawning research stemming from methodological differences.
To recommend more rigorous and standardized analytical approaches for future studies.
To improve the clarity and accuracy of conclusions drawn from contagious yawning research.

Main Methods:

The study reviews existing literature on contagious yawning.
It identifies inconsistencies in experimental designs and data analysis.

More Related Videos

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

Methods for Detecting Cough and Airway Inflammation in Mice

Methods for Detecting Cough and Airway Inflammation in Mice

Published on: August 2, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Laboratory Method to Measure Contagious Yawning in Rats

A Laboratory Method to Measure Contagious Yawning in Rats

Published on: June 14, 2019

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

Methods for Detecting Cough and Airway Inflammation in Mice

Methods for Detecting Cough and Airway Inflammation in Mice

Published on: August 2, 2024

Recommendations are provided for enhancing research rigor.

Main Results:

Significant variations exist in how contagious yawning is tested and analyzed across studies.
Lack of standardization leads to difficulties in comparing findings and drawing robust conclusions.
Inconsistent analyses can result in misleading interpretations and add confusion to the scientific literature.

Conclusions:

Standardizing methodologies and analytical frameworks is essential for advancing contagious yawning research.
A more unified approach will facilitate accurate comparisons and deeper insights into the mechanisms of yawning contagion.
Standardized studies on contagious yawning could serve as valuable tools for disciplines investigating empathy and social behavior.