Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a children's hospital
1Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-9750, USA. paul.hain@vanderbilt.edu
Insights
Reducing patient identification band errors is crucial for safety. Interventions significantly decreased defect rates from 6.5% to 2.6% through staff engagement and clear protocols.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Patient Safety Initiatives
- Hospital Operations Management
Background:
- Patient misidentification remains a significant healthcare quality and safety concern.
- Limited US data exists on effective interventions to reduce identification band error rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe interventions implemented at a children's hospital to reduce patient identification band errors.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on reducing defect rates.
Main Methods:
- Utilized web-based surveys to identify perceived barriers to zero defects in identification bands.
- Developed and implemented corrective action plans based on leadership, staff input, and survey data.
- Conducted unannounced audits, plotted data on statistical process control charts, and educated staff on a 'stop the line' protocol.
Main Results:
- Initial audit revealed a patient identification band defect rate of 20.4%, with a baseline mean of 6.5%.
- Post-intervention, the mean defect rate significantly decreased to 2.6%.
- Staff awareness and empowerment to 'stop the line' were identified as key drivers of improvement.
Conclusions:
- The hospital initially experienced a higher-than-expected rate of patient identification band errors.
- Staff engagement, clear expectations ('stop the line'), and utilizing staff feedback via surveys were critical for success.
- Continuous auditing and data sharing using statistical process control charts are essential for sustained improvement in patient identification accuracy.
Context:
Patient misidentification continues to be a quality and safety issue. There is a paucity of US data describing interventions to reduce identification band error rates.
Setting:
Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt.
Key Measures:
Percentage of patients with defective identification bands.
Strategies For Change:
Web-based surveys were sent, asking hospital personnel to anonymously identify perceived barriers to reaching zero defects with identification bands. Corrective action plans were created and implemented with ideas from leadership, front-line staff and the online survey. Data from unannounced audits of patient identification bands were plotted on statistical process control charts and shared monthly with staff. All hospital personnel were expected to "stop the line" if there were any patient identification questions.
Effects Of Change:
The first audit showed a defect rate of 20.4%. The original mean defect rate was 6.5%. After interventions and education, the new mean defect rate was 2.6%.
Lessons Learnt:
(a) The initial rate of patient identification band errors in the hospital was higher than expected. (b) The action resulting in most significant improvement was staff awareness of the problem, with clear expectations to immediately stop the line if a patient identification error was present. (c) Staff surveys are an excellent source of suggestions for combating patient identification issues. (d) Continued audit and data collection is necessary for sustainable staff focus and continued improvement. (e) Statistical process control charts are both an effective method to track results and an easily understood tool for sharing data with staff.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...