Related Experiment Videos
Auditory screening in high risk neonates: selection of a test protocol
1Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Summary
Evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAE) offer a cost-effective initial hearing screen for neonatal intensive care unit graduates. Auditory brain-stem response (ABR) is recommended for follow-up and for smaller patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal audiology
- Hearing screening technologies
- Clinical audiology protocols
Background:
- Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) graduates are at higher risk for hearing impairment.
- Early detection of hearing loss is crucial for developmental outcomes.
- Evaluating the efficacy of different audiological tests is essential for optimizing screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal test protocol for screening hearing impairment in NICU graduates.
- To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAE) and auditory brain-stem response (ABR) tests.
- To assess the feasibility of bone conduction ABR for differentiating hearing loss types.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 250 infants, graduates of a neonatal intensive care unit.
- Administration of evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAE) and air conduction auditory brain-stem response (ABR) to all infants.
- Bone conduction ABR performed on infants who failed the air conduction ABR test.
Main Results:
- Screening failure rates were not dependent on age at testing but were influenced by gestational age if tested before discharge.
- Infant hearing screening coverage was 98% before discharge and 81% for out-patients tested later.
- Bone conduction ABR proved feasible for routine use, differentiating conductive and sensorineural hearing losses.
Conclusions:
- For large cohorts, initial screening with EOAE followed by ABR for failures is the most cost-effective approach.
- For smaller groups, auditory brain-stem response (ABR) alone is recommended.
- Auditory brain-stem response (ABR) is preferred for follow-up due to lower failure rates and threshold measurement capabilities.