Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Surgical Closure of Equine Abdomen, Prevention, and Management of Incisional Complications
Published on: May 10, 2024
Use of negative pressure wound therapy during aeromedical evacuation of patients with combat-related blast injuries
Andrew N Pollak1, Elisha T Powell, Raymond Fang
1Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Suite T3R54, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. apollak@umoa.umm.edu
Abstract:
The purpose of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) during aeromedical evacuation from a combat zone to a regional treatment center. A retrospective review of patients who received NPWT during aeromedical evacuation from Iraq or Afghanistan to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) was performed. Data were collected describing mechanism of injury; anatomic site of NPWT application; number of sites per patient; date and time of NPWT application; date, time, and wound condition on arrival and inspection at LRMC; and complications encountered during aeromedical evacuation. Broad definitions of complications were employed. Any reported malfunction of NPWT devices or need to reinforce NPWT dressings was abstracted. Presence of tissue under the dressing requiring debridement was defined as a minor complication. Major complications were defined as wound sepsis with systemic manifestations. A total of 218 patients who had received NPWT for 298 wounds (1.37 per patient) during aeromedical evacuation were identified. Most wounds were due to high-energy blast or ballistic mechanisms. Average time from NPWT application to removal was 53 hours (range, 18-133 +/- 22 hours). Complications occurred at 14% of NPWT sites and in 19% of patients receiving NPWT. Most recorded complications were minor (95%). Two patients who arrived at LRMC with fever and evidence of wound sepsis improved rapidly after additional operative debridement. In no case was failure of the NPWT device in flight specifically implicated in the genesis of a recorded complication. In-flight device problems were identified in seven cases. Four of these could not be repaired in flight and were clamped. Complications were not increased in this cohort. Use of NPWT during aeromedical evacuation appears safe and feasible in a large cohort of patients with high-energy injuries. Complications were consistent with severity of injury and not related to failure of NPWT.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...