Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Mobile eye tracking in the real world: Best practices.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Predictive remapping and allocentric coding as consequences of energy efficiency in recurrent neural network models of active vision.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Beyond the first glance: How human presence enhances visual entropy and promotes spatial learning.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Maternal antibiotic exposure-mediated alterations in basal, and allergen-induced lung function are associated with altered recruitment of eosinophils to the developing lung.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Exploring Brain Dynamics Within the Approach-Avoidance Bias.

Brain sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating task-dependent top-down effects on overt visual attention.

Torsten Betz1, Tim C Kietzmann, Niklas Wilming

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany. tbetz@uos.de

Journal of Vision
|April 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High-level task information influences viewing behavior through strong top-down processing, not by altering feature weights in bottom-up systems. This research clarifies how cognitive tasks shape visual attention.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding how high-level task goals influence visual attention is crucial.
  • The interaction between top-down task information and bottom-up stimulus processing remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms by which task information modulates visual behavior.
  • To differentiate between weak (feature reweighting) and strong (independent processing) top-down influences.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded web page viewing behavior across three distinct tasks: free viewing, content awareness, and information search.
  • Analyzed task-dependent differences in viewing patterns.
  • Employed computational modeling to assess feature-fixation correlations and their explanatory power.

Main Results:

  • Significant task-specific variations in viewing behavior were observed.
  • Minor changes in feature-fixation correlations were insufficient to account for behavioral differences.
  • Computational models ruled out feature reweighting as the primary mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • The weak top-down hypothesis, mediated by feature reweighting, is not supported.
  • The strong top-down hypothesis, where task information acts independently, provides the most viable explanation for the observed visual behavior.