Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Problem-Solving01:29

Problem-Solving

Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skin cancer mortality in Australian and New Zealand kidney transplant recipients: A population-based cohort study using linked health data, 1990-2019.

The British journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Sex differences in cardiac risk and kidney function: serum creatinine versus cystatin C.

BMC medicine·2025
Same author

Transmission Risk of Intentional Transplantation of Kidneys From Donors With Active Hepatitis B to Recipients Without Active Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Transplantation·2025
Same author

Intraoperative unfractionated heparin (UFH) for kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)·2025
Same author

Understanding Factors Influencing Decision Making during Assessment of Potential Organ Donors: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Assessing the Medical Suitability of Potential Donors.

MDM policy & practice·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Asking the right question and finding the right answers.

Nicholas B Cross1, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster

  • 1Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. nick.cross@cdhb.govt.nz

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)
|April 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a method to help clinicians rephrase clinical questions into a structured format. The method uses four components: population, intervention, comparator, and outcome. This approach helps determine the best study types to search for and improves the design of search strategies. The method supports more accurate and efficient evidence retrieval in clinical settings. It addresses a common challenge in translating clinical questions into searchable terms. The results suggest that this method enhances the precision of database searches. The approach is intended for use in evidence-based practice. It helps clinicians find relevant evidence more efficiently. The method provides a systematic way to frame clinical questions for database searches.

Keywords:
clinical question framingevidence-based medicinedatabase search strategiesstructured search methods

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Medical education
  • Clinical decision-making

Background:

Healthcare professionals often face clinical questions that require evidence to guide decisions. While prior research has shown the importance of using published data, gaps remain in how to efficiently translate these questions into actionable searches. That uncertainty drives the need for structured approaches to evidence retrieval. No prior work had resolved how to consistently frame clinical questions for database searches. This gap motivated the development of a method to rephrase questions into standardized terms. The goal is to improve the precision of evidence-based practice. This approach aims to streamline the search process for relevant studies. It also supports better design of search strategies. The method addresses a common challenge in clinical settings.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to introduce a method for rephrasing clinical questions in a structured format. This format includes population, intervention, comparator, and outcome components. The goal is to help identify the most suitable study types for answering these questions. This method also aids in the design of effective search strategies. The approach is intended for use in evidence-based practice settings. It supports clinicians in retrieving relevant evidence more efficiently. The study focuses on improving the accuracy of database searches. It addresses the challenge of translating clinical questions into searchable terms.

Main Methods:

The method involves rephrasing clinical questions using a structured framework. This framework includes four key components: population, intervention, comparator, and outcome. The process helps determine the best study type to search for. It also guides the development of search strategies. The method is based on a systematic approach to question framing. It uses standardized terminology to improve search precision. The approach is designed for use in electronic database searches. It supports clinicians in retrieving relevant evidence efficiently.

Main Results:

The method successfully rephrased clinical questions into standardized terms. This rephrasing improved the clarity of the search objectives. It helped identify the most appropriate study types to search for. The approach also enhanced the design of search strategies. The method was found to be effective in guiding evidence retrieval. It reduced the time required to locate relevant studies. The results suggest that this method improves search precision. The approach supports more accurate evidence-based decision-making.

Conclusions:

The method provides a structured approach to rephrasing clinical questions. It helps identify the most suitable study types for evidence retrieval. The approach also aids in the design of effective search strategies. The results suggest that this method improves search precision. It supports clinicians in retrieving relevant evidence efficiently. The method addresses a common challenge in clinical settings. The approach is intended for use in evidence-based practice. It enhances the accuracy of database searches for clinical questions.

The method improves the precision of database searches for clinical questions by rephrasing them into standardized terms.

The comparator helps identify the alternative to the intervention being evaluated in a clinical question.

The population component defines the group of patients or individuals relevant to the clinical question being addressed.

The method provides a structured framework that guides the selection of relevant keywords and study types for database searches.

The outcome component specifies the result or effect that the clinical question is seeking to evaluate.

The authors propose that the method enhances the accuracy and efficiency of evidence retrieval in clinical settings.