Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026
05:32
Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
Causal attributions in King-Kopetzky syndrome
Helen Pryce1, Chris Metcalfe, Lindsay St Claire
1Centre for Hearing and Balance Studies, University of Bristol, UK. helen.pryce@bris.ac.uk
International Journal of Audiology
|April 13, 2010
Summary
Patients with normal hearing thresholds but reported hearing difficulties, diagnosed with King-Kopetzky syndrome (KKS), often attribute their symptoms to immunity and risk factors, not psychological causes. Audiologists should address these patient beliefs during consultations.
Area of Science:
- Audiology and Hearing Science
- Patient Perception and Beliefs in Healthcare
Background:
- A significant percentage of individuals seeking help for hearing issues exhibit normal hearing thresholds.
- These cases are often classified as King-Kopetzky syndrome (KKS), obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD), or auditory processing disorder (APD).
- Previous research has explored mechanistic bases, but patient-reported causal attributions remain under-identified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and analyze the causal attributions of hearing difficulties reported by patients diagnosed with King-Kopetzky syndrome (KKS).
- To understand patient beliefs regarding the origins of their hearing-related symptoms.
- To inform audiological practice and patient counseling strategies.
Main Methods:
- An observational survey was conducted.
- Data were collected from 100 individuals diagnosed with King-Kopetzky syndrome (KKS).
- The survey focused on participants' attributions for their perceived hearing difficulties.
Main Results:
- Participants predominantly attributed their hearing difficulties to immunity and risk-related factors.
- Psychological factors were not identified as causal by the participants.
- These attributions were consistent across different diagnostic classifications within the KKS group.
Conclusions:
- Patient beliefs about the causes of hearing difficulties, particularly in KKS, center on biological and risk factors.
- Psychological explanations for hearing difficulties are not recognized by these patients.
- Audiologists should tailor their counseling to align with and address these patient-held beliefs for effective management.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
01:15Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
01:30Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
01:15Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...