Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Punnett Squares

Punnett Squares

Punnett Squares

Punnett Squares

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Optimisation of selection for methane mitigation by integrating production traits with ruminal microbiome-driven breeding in beef cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026

Same author

Dietary Supplementation of Rumen-Inert Fatty Acids and Rumen-Protected Choline Modulates the Uterine Environment of Pregnant Beef Cows.

Molecular reproduction and development·2026

Same author

Seasonal dynamics in sheep fecal microbiome and soil bacterial communities under grazing management.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Data-driven enterosignatures link gut microbiome reorganization to heat stress responses in lactating sows.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026

Same author

Predicting beef diet nutritional composition and intake from rumen metagenomic profiles.

Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)·2026

Same author

Genomic insights into female productivity in limousine cattle: a single-step genome-wide association on longevity, fertility, and conformation traits.

BMC genomics·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels.

Matthew A Cleveland¹, Selma Forni¹, Nader Deeb¹

¹Genus plc., 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd., Suite 2200, Hendersonville, TN, 37075, USA.

BMC Proceedings

|April 13, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian methods for genomic prediction (GEBV) were compared. Student-t and Lasso methods showed strong predictive power, especially when using SNP markers selected by additive effect size, even at low densities.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

Genomics and Quantitative Genetics
Statistical Genetics
Animal Breeding

Background:

Bayesian methods for genomic breeding values (GEBV) prediction exist, utilizing marker variance and prior information for shrinkage.
Traditional Bayesian approaches often assume high-density genotype data for all individuals, which may not be practical.
This study evaluates GEBV prediction accuracy under varying SNP marker densities and data scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the predictive power of three Bayesian approaches (Bayes-A, Student-t, Lasso) for GEBV.
To assess GEBV prediction accuracy using high-density training data and predicting with low-density marker subsets.
To investigate the impact of SNP selection strategies and genotype probabilities on prediction accuracy.

Main Methods:

Compared Bayes-A, Student-t (generalized Bayes-A), and Bayesian Lasso for GEBV prediction.
Evaluated twelve scenarios using low-density marker subsets, including genome spacing and additive effect size selection.
Assessed the inclusion of genotype probabilities from pedigree and genotyped ancestors in prediction models.

Main Results:

Lasso yielded the highest GEBV accuracy when correlating with traditional breeding values; Student-t was most accurate against true breeding values.
SNP selection based on additive effect size provided high accuracy at low densities, comparable to high densities.
Inclusion of genotype probabilities in evenly-spaced subsets significantly increased GEBV accuracy, particularly for traits with many small QTL.

Conclusions:

Student-t slightly outperformed other methods for GEBV prediction at both high and low densities in this dataset.
Lasso demonstrated advantages when numerous small quantitative trait loci (QTL) are anticipated.
Low-density marker panels can be effective across traits when incorporating genotype probabilities with genome spacing selection.