Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Limits01:30

Introduction to Limits

A limit describes the value a function approaches as its input moves closer to a particular point. Even when a function is undefined at a specific value, limits allow us to analyze its behavior near that point. This concept is fundamental in calculus and essential for understanding continuity, derivatives, and integrals.Mathematically, a function f(x) has a limit L at x = a if its values L approach x as x gets arbitrarily close to a. This is written as:This notation expresses that the function...
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Linear Differential Equations01:27

Linear Differential Equations

The integrating factor method provides a systematic way to solve first-order linear differential equations, especially those that cannot be handled by separation of variables. This method is particularly useful in modeling time-dependent physical systems influenced by both constant inputs and resistive forces. A common example is the motion of a car subjected to a constant engine force while experiencing air resistance proportional to its velocity.In such scenarios, Newton’s second law yields a...
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Evaluating Limits by Direct Substitution01:29

Evaluating Limits by Direct Substitution

In the analysis of functions that represent continuous physical phenomena, it is often necessary to determine the output value as the input approaches a specific point. When a combination of algebraic terms defines the function and exhibits no discontinuities or abrupt changes near the point of interest, the limit of the function can be evaluated directly. This process, known as direct substitution, involves replacing the variable in the expression with the value it approaches.Direct...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Driver-initiated take-overs during critical evasion maneuvers in automated driving.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2022
Same author

Corrigendum to "Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions" [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940].

Accident; analysis and prevention·2022
Same author

Changes in shared and private e-scooter use in Brisbane, Australia and their safety implications.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2021
Same author

Influencing factors of observed speed and rule compliance of speed-pedelec riders in high volume cycling areas: Implications for safety and legislation.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2021
Same author

Traffic conflicts involving speed-pedelecs (fast electric bicycles): A naturalistic riding study.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems.

Nicole van Nes1, Stefan Brandenburg, Divera Twisk

  • 1SWOV, Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, The Netherlands. nicole.vannes@muarc.monash.edu.au

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|April 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Dynamic speed limit systems improve driving homogeneity, enhancing road safety. More advanced systems and dangerous conditions further increase speed consistency.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Traffic Safety Engineering
  • Human Factors in Transportation
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems

Background:

  • Driving speed homogeneity is crucial for road safety, with greater uniformity correlating to fewer accidents.
  • Traditional static speed limits may not adequately adapt to varying road conditions, potentially impacting safety.
  • Dynamic speed limit systems offer a potential solution to improve traffic flow and safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of dynamic speed limit systems on driving speed homogeneity.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different levels of dynamic speed limit system sophistication.
  • To assess driver acceptance and perceived usefulness of dynamic speed limit systems.

Main Methods:

  • A driving simulator study involving 46 participants who completed a route twice.
  • Manipulation of speed limit systems (static vs. dynamic), dynamic system sophistication (basic roadside, advanced roadside, in-car), and situational conditions (dangerous vs. non-dangerous).
  • Measurement of driving speed homogeneity, speed limit credibility, and system acceptance.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic speed limit systems significantly increased driving speed homogeneity compared to static systems.
  • More sophisticated dynamic speed limit systems resulted in higher speed homogeneity.
  • Drivers reported positive acceptance of dynamic speed limit systems, finding them useful and satisfactory.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic speed limit systems are effective in improving driving speed homogeneity, a key factor in road safety.
  • The sophistication of dynamic speed limit technology positively influences its effectiveness in promoting consistent driving speeds.
  • Driver acceptance suggests a favorable outlook for the implementation of dynamic speed limit systems in real-world traffic environments.